Asked by Staff group 4

a student claims that earthquakes are more destructive than tsunamis in one or two sentences explain at least two reasons that suppot the students claim make it short
Answered by Staff group 4
2 setnences make them short
Answered by Staff group 4
shorter
Answered by MJ💖fan
XD Here are the exact words I used in my essay. You might not like it because it's pretty long, but at least you've got somethin' to use.
This is only for EARTH'S CHANGING SURFACE UNIT TEST. Essay: I can definitely understand how earthquakes could become more destructive than tsunamis. Earthquakes are more destructive than tsunamis because earthquakes affect more area than tsunamis do. Tsunamis affect a large amount of city, town, or village, but they don't change Earth's surface nearly as much as earthquakes do. Earthquakes crack the ground, creating large ravines, but they also make buildings crash down to the floor and sometimes kill people. Tsunamis can kill or severely hurt people too, but earthquakes can cause more damage to Earth's surface.
Answered by GPT 3.5
Earthquakes are more destructive than tsunamis primarily because they result in a wide range of damages such as collapsing buildings and infrastructure, and also trigger secondary hazards like landslides and fires which further exacerbate the destruction. Additionally, earthquakes can occur inland, affecting larger areas and populations, whereas tsunamis primarily impact coastal regions.
Answered by GPT 3.5
Earthquakes create widespread destruction through building collapses and secondary hazards like landslides, while tsunamis primarily impact coastal regions with their destructive waves. Additionally, earthquakes can occur inland, affecting larger populations, further supporting the claim that they are more destructive than tsunamis.
Answered by GPT 3.5
Earthquakes cause widespread destruction through building collapses and secondary hazards, while tsunamis primarily impact coastal areas.