Ask a New Question

Asked by ash markens

Explain why you need to prove 2 triangles congruent before you can prove the parts of the triangles congruent.
2 years ago

Answers

Answer
can you put it in my words
2 years ago
There are no AI answers yet. The ability to request AI answers is coming soon!

Submit Your Answer


We prioritize human answers over AI answers.

If you are human, and you can answer this question, please submit your answer.

Related Questions

AB = AE BC = DE prove 1 = 2 prove cot x -tan x = 2 cot 2x Can you please help me prove that ((1-cosx)/(1+cosx))=(cscx-cotx)^2? I can only do work on one si... Prove: 2 - sec^x / 1+ tan ^x = cos 2x explain the prove the profit maximization of the consumer mu=p, according to cardinalist Prove that (2a,4a), (2a,6a) and (2a+a root3,5a) are vertices of an equilateral triangle. IfA+B+C=180°than prove that cosA+cosB-cosC=4cosA/2.sinB/2.cisC/2 Prove: 1. (cos^2⁡ x-1)^2=(1-2 cos⁡2x+cos^2⁡ 2x)/4 2.tan⁡(π+4x)=(4 tan⁡x-4 tan^3⁡ x)/(tan^4 ⁡x-6 ta... Prove: tan⁡(π+4x)=(4 tan⁡x-4 tan^3⁡ x)/(tan^4 ⁡x-6 tan^2 ⁡x+1) Which of the following is proven true with an investigation of NAFTA? (1 point) NAFTA allowed the m...
Submit Your Answer

Question

Explain why you need to prove 2 triangles congruent before you can prove the parts of the triangles congruent.

Ask a New Question
Archives Contact Us Privacy Policy Terms of Use