Which statement best analyzes the effect of leadership on the collapse of the Mongol Empire? (1 point)

The statement that best analyzes the effect of leadership on the collapse of the Mongol Empire is: Disputes over leadership led to the fragmentation of the Mongol Empire into smaller khanates. This statement suggests that internal disputes over leadership were a major factor in causing the empire to break up into smaller and separate regions.

The statement that best analyzes the effect of leadership on the collapse of the Mongol Empire is: "Disputes over leadership led to the fragmentation of the Mongol Empire into smaller khanates."

To analyze the effect of leadership on the collapse of the Mongol Empire, we need to consider the options provided and determine which one is the most accurate.

Option 1 states that disputes over leadership led to the fragmentation of the Mongol Empire into smaller khanates. This is an accurate statement as internal conflicts and power struggles among Mongol leaders did contribute to the division of the empire into separate territories ruled by different khans. However, we should examine the other options before coming to a conclusion.

Option 2 suggests that leaders such as Kublai Khan were assassinated by rival Mongol leaders, leaving the khanates open to invasion. While it is true that the assassination of leaders could have weakened the empire and made it more vulnerable to external threats, this option does not specifically address the collapse of the entire Mongol Empire. Therefore, it may not be the most accurate statement in analyzing the effect of leadership on the empire's collapse as a whole.

Option 3 points out that leaders such as Timur failed to respond to the bubonic plague, leading to widespread death within the khanates. Although the bubonic plague did have a significant impact on the Mongol Empire, causing devastation and population decline, it is not directly related to leadership and the collapse of the empire. Hence, this option may not be the most relevant for analyzing the effect of leadership on the empire's collapse.

Option 4 claims that disputes over leadership were resolved by giving Genghis Khan control over the entire Mongol Empire. This statement is not accurate because Genghis Khan was already the founder of the Mongol Empire and the unifying force behind it, so he already had overall control from the beginning. It does not explain the collapse of the empire but instead refers to the consolidation of power during its formation.

Considering the options provided, option 1, "Disputes over leadership led to the fragmentation of the Mongol Empire into smaller khanates," is the most accurate statement in analyzing the effect of leadership on the collapse of the Mongol Empire.