The most important argument to include in the paper would be option 4: "People in our town bike often but have no safe place on the road." This reason is the most compelling because it directly addresses the issue in your local community and highlights the need for safer infrastructure for cyclists.
To develop this argument in the paper, you should start by providing evidence to support the claim that people in your town bike often. This could be based on local surveys, statistics, or personal anecdotes from cyclists. Next, emphasize the lack of safe infrastructure for cyclists by discussing any reported accidents or near misses experienced by cyclists in your town. Additionally, you could mention any existing complaints or requests for bike lanes made by community members.
To strengthen the argument further, you could contrast your town with other towns that have successfully implemented bike lanes (as mentioned in option 1). This would show that it is both feasible and beneficial to have bike lanes in your community. Finally, it would be helpful to provide examples of the positive impact that bike lanes have had in other towns or cities, such as increased bike usage, improved safety, and enhanced community health.
By focusing on the need for safe cycling infrastructure and providing evidence and examples, you can effectively convince the local city council to increase the number of bike lanes in your town.