In 3-5 sentences, hypothesize what problems would have arisen if the elastic clause had not been included in the Constitution. Your answer should also include a critique of the Framers' decision to include the elastic clause in the Constitution. Your response should consider the following: a thesis statement and one piece of evidence that supports your claim, and reasoning that explains how your evidence backs up your claim. (4 points)
1 answer
If the elastic clause had not been included in the Constitution, numerous problems would have arisen. Without the elastic clause, the federal government would have been limited in its ability to address unforeseen circumstances and adapt to changing times. For example, the federal government would have struggled to address technological advancements or respond to emerging issues such as internet regulation. This limitation would have hindered the government's ability to effectively govern and uphold the principles of democracy. The Framers' decision to include the elastic clause in the Constitution was a prudent one as it provided the necessary flexibility for the federal government to function properly and meet the needs of a growing nation. This decision demonstrated the Framers' recognition of the importance of a government's ability to adapt and make decisions in the best interest of the people. So, it can be argued that the inclusion of the elastic clause was a necessary provision that ensured the effectiveness and longevity of the Constitution.
3 answers