Question

Question
How is a concurring opinion different from a dissenting opinion?

Responses

A concurring opinion explains why a justice disagrees with the majority decision, but abstains from ruling on the case, while a dissenting opinion describes the feelings of the majority.

A concurring opinion explains why a justice disagrees with the majority decision, but abstains from ruling on the case, while a dissenting opinion describes the feelings of the majority.

A concurring opinion asserts that two similar cases should be aligned and ruled on together, while a dissenting opinion insists that the case being heard is singular and unique.

A concurring opinion asserts that two similar cases should be aligned and ruled on together, while a dissenting opinion insists that the case being heard is singular and unique.

A concurring opinion demands that all justices rule in the same way on a case, while a dissenting opinion explains the differing opinions of justices who ruled the same way on a case.

A concurring opinion demands that all justices rule in the same way on a case, while a dissenting opinion explains the differing opinions of justices who ruled the same way on a case.

A concurring opinion agrees with the majority decision, but for different legal reasons, while a dissenting opinion explains why one or more justices disagree with the majority.
GPT 3.5
A concurring opinion agrees with the majority decision, but for different legal reasons, while a dissenting opinion explains why one or more justices disagree with the majority.

Related Questions

A written Supreme Court opinion that, in the absence of a majority opinion, represents the reasoning... When Supreme Court justice agrees with the decision reached by the court in case, but not with the r... After the Supreme Court reaches a decision on a case, a justice is assigned to write the agreement m... Appellate Jurisdiction Civil Case Concurring Opinion Defendant Dissenting Opinion Inferior Courts M...