Asked by caca

Use the table to answer the question.

Time (years) Bear Population
1 6
20 120
60 240
One biologist claimed that the bear population was proportionally related to the number of years after they were reintroduced into the wild. Based on the information in the table, would you agree? Explain your answer.

(1 point)
Responses

The bear population is not proportionally related to the number of years because the ratios are equivalent.
The bear population is not proportionally related to the number of years because the ratios are equivalent.

The bear population is proportionally related to the number of years because the ratios are not equivalent.
The bear population is proportionally related to the number of years because the ratios are not equivalent.

The bear population is proportionally related to the number of years because the ratios are equivalent.
The bear population is proportionally related to the number of years because the ratios are equivalent.

The bear population is not proportionally related to the number of years because the ratio in the last row is not equal to the ratios in the first two rows.
Answered by caca
ya' sure?
Answered by caca
you swear on god this is correct? 🔫
Answered by caca
YOU SWEAR ON GOD?
Answered by caca
mk are you sure tho
Answered by caca
double check
Answered by Damon
change in y/ change in x = 6/1
or = (120 - 6) / (20-1) = 114/19 = 6/1
or = (240 - 120) / (60 - 20) = 120/40 = 3/1
slope decreases, not reproducing so fast. Perhaps ate all the good berries.
Answered by Damon
But the slope decreases from 6 to 3. NOT linear
There are no AI answers yet. The ability to request AI answers is coming soon!