All of the reasons mentioned provide valid explanations as to why the Supreme Court ruled in Engel v. Vitale that a public school district cannot compose a school prayer to begin the school day:
1. Public schools are government institutions and cannot establish religious practices: The First Amendment of the United States Constitution prohibits the government from establishing a religion, and as public schools are government-run institutions, they must remain neutral in matters of religion.
2. Students are citizens and should not be forced to do things they don’t agree with: The Supreme Court has consistently emphasized that students in public schools have the right to freedom of religion and should not be compelled to participate in religious activities or prayers that go against their personal beliefs.
3. It would take away parents’ rights to practice a different religion at home: Allowing a public school to compose a prayer would infringe upon the rights of parents to raise their children according to their own religious beliefs. By imposing a specific prayer on students, the school would be interfering with parents' authority to teach and practice their religion at home.
4. Taxpayers should agree before being asked to fund religious activities in public schools: Public schools are funded by taxpayers, and it would be unfair to use taxpayer funds to promote or endorse a specific religious practice through the composition of a school prayer. The Supreme Court's ruling ensures that taxpayer dollars are not used to advance a particular religious agenda within the public school environment.