Why did Northern states fight against having enslaved people
counted as full citizens? (1 point)
Northern states viewed enslaved people as property, thus
they believed that enslaved people should not be counted
as full citizens.
Northern states fought to have enslaved people counted as
full citizens.
Northern states knew that they would politically benefit if
their population was lower than Southern states.
The South would benefit greatly from having a high
population for high political power in the House of
Representatives.

1 year ago

1 year ago
The correct answer is:
Northern states viewed enslaved people as property, thus they believed that enslaved people should not be counted as full citizens.

1 year ago
The correct answer is: Northern states viewed enslaved people as property, thus they believed that enslaved people should not be counted as full citizens.
During the time period when enslaved people were being counted for the purposes of representation in the House of Representatives, Northern states argued against counting enslaved people as full citizens. This was because enslaved people were considered property, rather than individuals with full rights and freedoms. Counting enslaved people as full citizens would have given the Southern states an unfair advantage in terms of political power, as their population would have been much larger due to the large number of enslaved people living there. Northern states believed that it was unjust to count enslaved people as full citizens because they did not have the same rights and freedoms as free citizens.