Answer the following questions.
Question 1: What statement BEST describes the process used by the Supreme Court to issue an opinion?
Answer A: A select group of Supreme Court justices will hear oral arguments and decide whether the case should be heard by all the justices before accepting to review the case.
Answer B: The Supreme Court Justices listen to briefs and oral arguments from both sides and will publicly debate the case to vote and decide on their final opinion.
Answer C: A Supreme court receives briefs and oral arguments from both sides before justices privately review the case and conduct a vote to issue their final opinion.
Answer D: A single supreme court justice will review briefs, listen to oral arguments, and decide on the outcome of a case before issuing the final opinion.
Question 2: A minimum of five justice votes must be included for what type of opinion to be issued?
Answer A: Per Curiam Opinion.
Answer B: Majority Opinion.
Answer C: Dissenting Opinion.
Answer D: Concurrent Opinion.
Question 3: What BEST describes the process used by the Supreme court to grant a writ of Certiorari?
Answer A: The court must review all cases where a review is requested.
Answer B: A unanimous vote by the justices grants a review of the case.
Answer C: A majority vote of five justices requires a review of the case.
Answer D: A vote of four justices can grant a review of the case.
Question 4: What type of jurisdiction gives the Supreme Court the authority to grant a writ of certiorari?
Answer A: Rule 10
Answer B: Appellate and Original Jurisdiction
Answer C: Original Jurisdiction
Answer D: Appellate Jurisdiction
Question 5: What is the contrast between judicial restrain and judicial activism in the Supreme Court?
Answer A: Judicial restraint means the court reviews the action; judicial activism means to court does not get involved
Answer B: Judicial restraint means the court takes ownership of the issues; judicial activism means the court has a lot of power
Answer C: Judicial restraint means the court does not get involved; judicial activism means the court reviews the action
Answer D: Judicial restraint means the court does not include its own preferences; judicial activism means the court is silent on the issues of the branches
1 answer
Question 2: Answer B: Majority Opinion.
Question 3: Answer D: A vote of four justices can grant a review of the case.
Question 4: Answer D: Appellate Jurisdiction
Question 5: Answer C: Judicial restraint means the court does not get involved; judicial activism means the court reviews the action.