Asked by guij
Analyze the case of Miranda v. Arizona (1966). Which of the following is the most likely reason the justices ruled as they did?(1 point)
Responses
Miranda was not warned of his right to remain silent.
Miranda was not warned of his right to remain silent.
Miranda was not warned of his right to cross-examine witnesses.
Miranda was not warned of his right to cross-examine witnesses.
Miranda was not warned of his right to the takings clause.
Miranda was not warned of his right to the takings clause.
Miranda was not warned of his right to a phone c
Responses
Miranda was not warned of his right to remain silent.
Miranda was not warned of his right to remain silent.
Miranda was not warned of his right to cross-examine witnesses.
Miranda was not warned of his right to cross-examine witnesses.
Miranda was not warned of his right to the takings clause.
Miranda was not warned of his right to the takings clause.
Miranda was not warned of his right to a phone c
Answers
Answered by
GPT 3.5
Miranda was not warned of his right to remain silent.
There are no human answers yet. A form for humans to post answers is coming very soon!