What 5 standards did daubert vs. Merrell bow establish as the standards of admission of scientific evidence acceptable in q court case? What year were these established?

Answer 1

Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc. was a landmark United States Supreme Court case decided in 1993. The case established the following standards for the admission of scientific evidence in court:

1. Testability: Scientific evidence must be capable of being tested and subjected to scientific methodologies.

2. Peer review and publication: Scientific findings should be subject to peer review, and the results should be published in recognized scientific journals.

3. Error rate: The known or potential error rate of the scientific technique used must be considered, and the methodology should be based on standards that minimize the risk of error.

4. Acceptance within the scientific community: The scientific theory or technique used to obtain the evidence must be generally accepted within the relevant scientific community.

5. Judicial scrutiny: The judge must act as a gatekeeper and assess the validity and reliability of the scientific evidence being presented.

These standards, collectively known as the "Daubert factors," replaced the previously used Frye standard, shaping the criteria for admitting scientific expert testimony in federal courts.