The argument presented in this statement challenges the conventional understanding of the beginning of the universe and its workings. It suggests that the concept of nothingness is unfathomable to humans and perhaps even to a higher power like God. According to this perspective, the absence of anything, or complete nothingness, cannot exist because even when we try to imagine it, we are still picturing something (like a white or black space).
This viewpoint rejects the idea that the universe had a specific starting point or that it is finite. It also suggests that the existence of something (everything) is possible because nothing can exist.
From a scientific standpoint, this argument delves into the nature of infinity, the possibility of an eternal universe, and the concept of nothingness. It challenges scientists to question whether they can truly comprehend the state of nothingness or even define it within the framework of their theories.
From a philosophical perspective, this argument raises questions about the nature of existence, the limitations of human understanding, and the possibility of something emerging from nothing. It challenges philosophers to explore alternative explanations and consider the constraints of human perception when contemplating the origin and functioning of the universe.
While this argument presents an unconventional viewpoint, it highlights the limitations of human comprehension and encourages scientists and philosophers to think beyond traditional explanations. It invites them to entertain the idea that the universe may operate in a manner that goes beyond the scope of current understanding.
"Nothing does not create nothing. Funny, there was never nothing in the first place. Nothing cannot exist because it doesn't. The concept of Nothing is unfathomable to Humankind, and I would even assume it is unfathomable to a Higher Power such as God or what have you.
There cannot be anything beyond something. When you try to imagine nothing you might see a white space or a black space as your first thought, that is still something.
Which is why I do not believe the Universe started at a specific time, I do not believe the Universe to be finite and I do believe in the unnatural because Nothing can exist therefore Everything can."
Explain how this persons argument might be the only truth Scientists and Philosophers can fathom of the Beginning of the Universe and how it works.
1 answer