Which type of photographer was Margaret Bourke white??
29 answers
Margaret Bourke-White was primarily known as a photojournalist and documentary photographer. She was one of the first female war correspondents and covered major events such as World War II and the Great Depression. She was also well-known for her industrial and architectural photography.
Which best describes the best limitation of the first daguerreotype?
One of the key limitations of the first daguerreotype process was its long exposure time. The earliest daguerreotypes required a camera exposure of several minutes or more, making it difficult to capture fast-moving subjects or scenes with significant motion. This limitation meant that daguerreotypes were mainly used for still life subjects or stationary portraits.
Wedding pictures taken today differ from getting to you late 1800s?
In the 1800s no one was able to get wedding pictures taken
Today professional photographers take wedding photographs
Today couples have many pictures taken and choose favorites
In the 1800s photography is only for when people died not weddings
In the 1800s no one was able to get wedding pictures taken
Today professional photographers take wedding photographs
Today couples have many pictures taken and choose favorites
In the 1800s photography is only for when people died not weddings
There are several differences between wedding photography today and in the late 1800s:
1. Availability: In the 1800s, the technology and accessibility of photography were limited. Photography was expensive and time-consuming, making it impractical for most people to have wedding photographs taken. It was more common to have post-mortem photographs taken after someone passed away. Today, with advancements in technology, professional wedding photography is widely available and accessible.
2. Style and Approach: In the 1800s, photography was a formal and posed process. The long exposure times required subjects to stay still for extended periods, resulting in stiff and staged images. Today, wedding photography has evolved into a more natural and candid style. Photographers capture spontaneous moments, emotions, and the overall atmosphere of the wedding day.
3. Quantity and Selection: In the past, due to the limitations of film and cost, wedding couples would usually have only a few formal posed portraits taken. Today, couples have the opportunity to have many photographs taken throughout the day, capturing different moments, details, and emotions. They often have the luxury of selecting their favorite images from a larger collection.
Overall, the advancements in technology, the availability of professional photographers, and the changing styles and expectations have made wedding photography more accessible, diverse, and personalized today compared to the limited options available in the late 1800s.
1. Availability: In the 1800s, the technology and accessibility of photography were limited. Photography was expensive and time-consuming, making it impractical for most people to have wedding photographs taken. It was more common to have post-mortem photographs taken after someone passed away. Today, with advancements in technology, professional wedding photography is widely available and accessible.
2. Style and Approach: In the 1800s, photography was a formal and posed process. The long exposure times required subjects to stay still for extended periods, resulting in stiff and staged images. Today, wedding photography has evolved into a more natural and candid style. Photographers capture spontaneous moments, emotions, and the overall atmosphere of the wedding day.
3. Quantity and Selection: In the past, due to the limitations of film and cost, wedding couples would usually have only a few formal posed portraits taken. Today, couples have the opportunity to have many photographs taken throughout the day, capturing different moments, details, and emotions. They often have the luxury of selecting their favorite images from a larger collection.
Overall, the advancements in technology, the availability of professional photographers, and the changing styles and expectations have made wedding photography more accessible, diverse, and personalized today compared to the limited options available in the late 1800s.
Just pick one
The main difference between wedding photography today and in the late 1800s is the availability and accessibility. In the 1800s, photography was not commonly used for weddings as it was expensive, time-consuming, and primarily associated with memorializing the deceased. Today, professional photographers are readily available to capture wedding moments, and couples have the option to have numerous photos taken and choose their favorites from a larger collection.
How did a camera obscura differ from a regular camera
A camera obscura is an optical device that predates modern cameras. It consists of a dark box or room with a small hole or aperture on one side. Light from the outside passes through the hole and projects an inverted image of the scene onto a surface inside the box/room.
A regular camera, on the other hand, refers to the various types of photographic devices used to capture and record images. These can include film cameras, digital cameras, and even smartphone cameras. Unlike a camera obscura, a regular camera uses lenses to focus light onto a photosensitive medium (such as film or an image sensor) to create a permanent image that does not require the presence of a dark environment to be viewed. Additionally, regular cameras typically allow adjustments of focus, shutter speed, aperture, and other settings to control various aspects of the image capture process.
A regular camera, on the other hand, refers to the various types of photographic devices used to capture and record images. These can include film cameras, digital cameras, and even smartphone cameras. Unlike a camera obscura, a regular camera uses lenses to focus light onto a photosensitive medium (such as film or an image sensor) to create a permanent image that does not require the presence of a dark environment to be viewed. Additionally, regular cameras typically allow adjustments of focus, shutter speed, aperture, and other settings to control various aspects of the image capture process.
What most distinguishes Victorian photographers from today?
There are several factors that distinguish Victorian photographers from today:
1. Technological Differences: Victorian photographers worked with large format cameras and used techniques like wet plate collodion process, which required on-site preparation and immediate development of the plate. Today, digital cameras and advancements in technology have made photography more accessible, quick, and convenient.
2. Process and Workflow: Victorian photographers had a more cumbersome and time-consuming process. They had to carry heavy equipment, set up portable darkrooms, and work with chemicals to develop their images. Modern photographers, in contrast, benefit from instant preview and post-processing capabilities, allowing for immediate adjustments and enhancements.
3. Subject Matter and Style: Victorian photographers often focused on formal and posed portraits, landscapes, and architectural structures. The limitations of the technology of that time made capturing action shots or candid moments more difficult. Today, photographers have a wider range of subject matter and styles, including photojournalism, street photography, fashion, and artistic experimentation.
4. Accessibility and Popularity: In the Victorian era, photography was largely reserved for professionals or the privileged class due to its cost and complexity. Today, with the advent of smartphones and affordable digital cameras, photography has become more accessible to a broader population. It has become an integral part of our daily lives, with millions of images captured and shared every day.
These factors highlight the significant differences between Victorian photographers and photographers in the modern era, reflecting the evolution of technology, techniques, and the democratization of photography as an art form.
1. Technological Differences: Victorian photographers worked with large format cameras and used techniques like wet plate collodion process, which required on-site preparation and immediate development of the plate. Today, digital cameras and advancements in technology have made photography more accessible, quick, and convenient.
2. Process and Workflow: Victorian photographers had a more cumbersome and time-consuming process. They had to carry heavy equipment, set up portable darkrooms, and work with chemicals to develop their images. Modern photographers, in contrast, benefit from instant preview and post-processing capabilities, allowing for immediate adjustments and enhancements.
3. Subject Matter and Style: Victorian photographers often focused on formal and posed portraits, landscapes, and architectural structures. The limitations of the technology of that time made capturing action shots or candid moments more difficult. Today, photographers have a wider range of subject matter and styles, including photojournalism, street photography, fashion, and artistic experimentation.
4. Accessibility and Popularity: In the Victorian era, photography was largely reserved for professionals or the privileged class due to its cost and complexity. Today, with the advent of smartphones and affordable digital cameras, photography has become more accessible to a broader population. It has become an integral part of our daily lives, with millions of images captured and shared every day.
These factors highlight the significant differences between Victorian photographers and photographers in the modern era, reflecting the evolution of technology, techniques, and the democratization of photography as an art form.
What is the primary limitation on photographs taken by nicèphore nièpce
One of the primary limitations of photographs taken by Nicéphore Niépce, one of the pioneers of photography, was the extremely long exposure time required. Niépce's earliest experiments with photography in the 1820s and 1830s often required several hours of exposure to capture a usable image. This was due to the limitations of the materials and technology available at the time. The long exposure times made it difficult to capture fast-moving subjects or scenes with significant motion, limiting the range of subjects that could be effectively photographed. Additionally, the long exposures often resulted in images with blurred or indistinct details, as slight movements during the exposure could cause blurring.
What is the primary limitation on photographs taken by nicèphore nièpce
They took 8 hours to create
They could not include moving people
They require silver closure with was rare
They would continue to darken if exposed to light
They took 8 hours to create
They could not include moving people
They require silver closure with was rare
They would continue to darken if exposed to light
The primary limitation on photographs taken by Nicéphore Niépce was their long exposure time. As you correctly mentioned, his early photographs required several hours, sometimes even up to 8 hours, to capture a single image. This was primarily due to the sensitivity of the materials used at that time and the limited understanding of the photographic process. The long exposure time made it challenging to photograph moving subjects, such as people, as any motion would result in blurred or indistinct images. Additionally, the early photographs taken by Niépce were prone to further darkening or damage if exposed to light after their initial capture, as they lacked a permanent or stable fixing process.
The motto press the button was designed to highlight what aspect of the brownie
The motto "press the button, we do the rest" was designed to highlight the simplicity and ease of use of the Brownie camera. The Brownie, introduced by Kodak in 1900, was one of the first affordable and widely available cameras suitable for the general public. The motto emphasized the idea that anyone, regardless of their photographic knowledge or expertise, could operate the Brownie by simply pressing the shutter button. It signaled a shift towards democratizing photography and making it more accessible to a wider audience, as it eliminated the need for complicated camera settings and technical know-how.
What big breakthrough did Eastman Kodak have at the beginning of the 20th century that made photography more accessible
At the beginning of the 20th century, Eastman Kodak had a significant breakthrough with the introduction of the Kodak Brownie camera and the concept of the "Kodak system." This breakthrough made photography more accessible to the general public.
The Kodak Brownie camera, introduced in 1900, was one of the first affordable and easy-to-use cameras available on the market. It revolutionized photography by simplifying the process and making it accessible to a wider audience. The Brownie camera was inexpensive, portable, and used roll film, which was easier to handle compared to earlier photographic processes. Its slogan, "You press the button, we do the rest," reflected its simplicity and ease of use.
In addition to the camera, Eastman Kodak also introduced the concept of the "Kodak system." This system included not only the camera but also the film, processing, and printing services provided by Kodak. Users could purchase pre-loaded film rolls, shoot their photos, and then send the entire camera to Kodak for film processing and printing. This made the entire photographic process more convenient and accessible to individuals who did not have the knowledge or resources to develop and print their photographs themselves.
Through these breakthroughs, Eastman Kodak played a crucial role in making photography more accessible to the masses, transforming it from a complex and expensive process reserved for professionals to a popular and widely practiced hobby by ordinary people.
The Kodak Brownie camera, introduced in 1900, was one of the first affordable and easy-to-use cameras available on the market. It revolutionized photography by simplifying the process and making it accessible to a wider audience. The Brownie camera was inexpensive, portable, and used roll film, which was easier to handle compared to earlier photographic processes. Its slogan, "You press the button, we do the rest," reflected its simplicity and ease of use.
In addition to the camera, Eastman Kodak also introduced the concept of the "Kodak system." This system included not only the camera but also the film, processing, and printing services provided by Kodak. Users could purchase pre-loaded film rolls, shoot their photos, and then send the entire camera to Kodak for film processing and printing. This made the entire photographic process more convenient and accessible to individuals who did not have the knowledge or resources to develop and print their photographs themselves.
Through these breakthroughs, Eastman Kodak played a crucial role in making photography more accessible to the masses, transforming it from a complex and expensive process reserved for professionals to a popular and widely practiced hobby by ordinary people.
In the earliest stages of photography after the camera ovscura development in which of these made photography more possible
In the earliest stages of photography after the development of the camera obscura, several key innovations and advancements made photography more possible:
1. Discovery of photosensitive materials: The discovery of photosensitive chemicals, such as silver nitrate and silver chloride, and their reaction to light played a crucial role in capturing and fixing images. These chemicals were applied to surfaces like glass plates or paper, enabling the recording of a latent image after exposure to light.
2. Development of the Daguerreotype: Louis Daguerre's invention of the daguerreotype process in 1839 was a significant milestone in photography. This process involved exposing a silver-coated copper plate to light, developing it with mercury vapor, and fixing the image with a salt solution. Daguerreotypes allowed for the creation of highly detailed and permanent images.
3. Introduction of Collodion Process: The collodion process, introduced in the 1850s, involved applying a mixture of collodion (a syrupy solution) and light-sensitive chemicals onto glass plates. These plates had to be exposed and developed while still wet, resulting in crisp and detailed negatives. The collodion process allowed for sharper and more easily reproducible images compared to earlier processes.
4. Evolution of film: The introduction of flexible film allowed for more convenient and portable photography. Initially made from a nitrocellulose base, roll film was easier to handle and could be loaded into cameras more efficiently. The invention of the roll film by George Eastman, founder of Eastman Kodak, in the late 1880s, paved the way for the development of mass-produced and affordable cameras such as the Kodak Brownie.
These innovations and advancements in photosensitive materials, processes, and film made photography more feasible and accessible, transitioning it from a time-consuming and specialized practice to one that could be enjoyed by a wider range of people.
1. Discovery of photosensitive materials: The discovery of photosensitive chemicals, such as silver nitrate and silver chloride, and their reaction to light played a crucial role in capturing and fixing images. These chemicals were applied to surfaces like glass plates or paper, enabling the recording of a latent image after exposure to light.
2. Development of the Daguerreotype: Louis Daguerre's invention of the daguerreotype process in 1839 was a significant milestone in photography. This process involved exposing a silver-coated copper plate to light, developing it with mercury vapor, and fixing the image with a salt solution. Daguerreotypes allowed for the creation of highly detailed and permanent images.
3. Introduction of Collodion Process: The collodion process, introduced in the 1850s, involved applying a mixture of collodion (a syrupy solution) and light-sensitive chemicals onto glass plates. These plates had to be exposed and developed while still wet, resulting in crisp and detailed negatives. The collodion process allowed for sharper and more easily reproducible images compared to earlier processes.
4. Evolution of film: The introduction of flexible film allowed for more convenient and portable photography. Initially made from a nitrocellulose base, roll film was easier to handle and could be loaded into cameras more efficiently. The invention of the roll film by George Eastman, founder of Eastman Kodak, in the late 1880s, paved the way for the development of mass-produced and affordable cameras such as the Kodak Brownie.
These innovations and advancements in photosensitive materials, processes, and film made photography more feasible and accessible, transitioning it from a time-consuming and specialized practice to one that could be enjoyed by a wider range of people.
Which best explains why people in photographs from the 1800s tend to look so serious
Several factors contribute to the serious and stoic expressions seen in many photographs from the 1800s:
1. Long Exposure Times: In the early days of photography, exposure times were quite long, often several seconds or even minutes. Subjects had to hold their poses for extended periods, which led to a tendency to adopt serious expressions to avoid blurring the image.
2. Lack of Candid Photography: The technology and process of early photography did not lend itself well to capturing candid moments or natural smiles. Portrait sittings were often formal and staged, with subjects instructed to remain still and composed. Smiling was not a natural or customary pose for formal portraiture at that time.
3. Technical Limitations: The equipment and processes used in early photography required subjects to remain as still as possible to avoid blurring. This, coupled with long exposure times, made it challenging to capture spontaneous expressions or smiles.
4. Cultural Expectations and Social Norms: The cultural and societal context of the 1800s may have also influenced the serious appearance in photographs. It was a time of formality and strict social conventions, and that seriousness was deemed more appropriate for formal portraits.
It's important to note that these factors contributed to the prevalence of serious expressions during that period, but it does not mean that people in the 1800s were constantly serious in their daily lives. Photography was still relatively new, and there were technical and cultural factors that influenced the way people presented themselves in front of the camera.
1. Long Exposure Times: In the early days of photography, exposure times were quite long, often several seconds or even minutes. Subjects had to hold their poses for extended periods, which led to a tendency to adopt serious expressions to avoid blurring the image.
2. Lack of Candid Photography: The technology and process of early photography did not lend itself well to capturing candid moments or natural smiles. Portrait sittings were often formal and staged, with subjects instructed to remain still and composed. Smiling was not a natural or customary pose for formal portraiture at that time.
3. Technical Limitations: The equipment and processes used in early photography required subjects to remain as still as possible to avoid blurring. This, coupled with long exposure times, made it challenging to capture spontaneous expressions or smiles.
4. Cultural Expectations and Social Norms: The cultural and societal context of the 1800s may have also influenced the serious appearance in photographs. It was a time of formality and strict social conventions, and that seriousness was deemed more appropriate for formal portraits.
It's important to note that these factors contributed to the prevalence of serious expressions during that period, but it does not mean that people in the 1800s were constantly serious in their daily lives. Photography was still relatively new, and there were technical and cultural factors that influenced the way people presented themselves in front of the camera.
How much was a camera in the 1800s
In the 1800s, cameras were generally expensive and considered a luxury item. Prices varied depending on the specific type and model of the camera, as different camera designs and technologies were developed and improved throughout the century.
During the early years of photography, in the 1830s and 1840s, cameras were primarily handmade and required significant skill and labor. These early cameras, such as daguerreotype cameras, were quite expensive and were mainly accessible to professionals or wealthy individuals. They could cost anywhere from several hundred to several thousand dollars, which would be a substantial amount of money at the time.
As the century progressed and advancements in technology and mass production occurred, cameras became more accessible to the middle class. For example, George Eastman's introduction of the Kodak camera in the 1880s made photography more affordable for a broader range of people. The original Kodak camera, sold with film pre-loaded, was priced at $25, which was considered relatively reasonable for the time.
However, it is important to note that the cost of a camera in the 1800s would also depend on factors such as the camera's features, format, size, and the specific manufacturer. Additionally, the cost of photographic materials, such as the necessary chemicals and plates, also factored into the overall expense of photography during that time.
During the early years of photography, in the 1830s and 1840s, cameras were primarily handmade and required significant skill and labor. These early cameras, such as daguerreotype cameras, were quite expensive and were mainly accessible to professionals or wealthy individuals. They could cost anywhere from several hundred to several thousand dollars, which would be a substantial amount of money at the time.
As the century progressed and advancements in technology and mass production occurred, cameras became more accessible to the middle class. For example, George Eastman's introduction of the Kodak camera in the 1880s made photography more affordable for a broader range of people. The original Kodak camera, sold with film pre-loaded, was priced at $25, which was considered relatively reasonable for the time.
However, it is important to note that the cost of a camera in the 1800s would also depend on factors such as the camera's features, format, size, and the specific manufacturer. Additionally, the cost of photographic materials, such as the necessary chemicals and plates, also factored into the overall expense of photography during that time.
Which best explains why photo journalism did not emerge into lull the civil wars
The emergence of photojournalism during the Civil War was limited primarily due to technological constraints and logistical challenges:
1. Technical Limitations: The Civil War took place between 1861 and 1865, a time when photography was still in its early stages. The photography equipment of that era was bulky, cumbersome, and required long exposure times. It was challenging to capture action-packed scenes or battlefields effectively. The technology at the time made it difficult to produce and distribute images quickly enough for timely news coverage.
2. Lack of Infrastructure: Infrastructure for transmitting images did not exist during the Civil War era. The telegraph was the primary means of long-distance communication, but transmitting photographs was not feasible at the time. The lack of infrastructure hindered the ability to transmit photographs immediately to newspapers and media outlets.
3. Limited Availability of Photographers: Photographers were often closely associated with the military, as they were primarily employed as portrait photographers rather than photojournalists. They focused on creating formal portraits of officers and soldiers, rather than capturing scenes from the front lines or documenting the war in a journalistic manner. Additionally, the technology and nature of war made it difficult and dangerous for photographers to operate in the midst of battles.
4. Production and Distribution Challenges: The process of developing and printing photographs was time-consuming and labor-intensive. There were logistical challenges in transporting the necessary chemicals, plates, and equipment to remote areas. Furthermore, the distribution of photographs during the war was primarily limited to physical prints, which required physical delivery to newspapers or the public.
It wasn't until later conflicts, such as the Spanish-American War in the late 1890s, that the advancements in photographic technology and the establishment of improved communication and distribution networks allowed for more effective photojournalistic coverage of wars.
1. Technical Limitations: The Civil War took place between 1861 and 1865, a time when photography was still in its early stages. The photography equipment of that era was bulky, cumbersome, and required long exposure times. It was challenging to capture action-packed scenes or battlefields effectively. The technology at the time made it difficult to produce and distribute images quickly enough for timely news coverage.
2. Lack of Infrastructure: Infrastructure for transmitting images did not exist during the Civil War era. The telegraph was the primary means of long-distance communication, but transmitting photographs was not feasible at the time. The lack of infrastructure hindered the ability to transmit photographs immediately to newspapers and media outlets.
3. Limited Availability of Photographers: Photographers were often closely associated with the military, as they were primarily employed as portrait photographers rather than photojournalists. They focused on creating formal portraits of officers and soldiers, rather than capturing scenes from the front lines or documenting the war in a journalistic manner. Additionally, the technology and nature of war made it difficult and dangerous for photographers to operate in the midst of battles.
4. Production and Distribution Challenges: The process of developing and printing photographs was time-consuming and labor-intensive. There were logistical challenges in transporting the necessary chemicals, plates, and equipment to remote areas. Furthermore, the distribution of photographs during the war was primarily limited to physical prints, which required physical delivery to newspapers or the public.
It wasn't until later conflicts, such as the Spanish-American War in the late 1890s, that the advancements in photographic technology and the establishment of improved communication and distribution networks allowed for more effective photojournalistic coverage of wars.
Eastman Kodak. Could sell the brownie for very little because it knew it would make money off of the salmon photo processing what would be the best equivalent to this in today’s society
Cars the require gas and maintenance
Inexpensive print ones and costly ink cartridges
Food Services with additional cost for takeout
Sports clothes that are matching jackets and pants
Cars the require gas and maintenance
Inexpensive print ones and costly ink cartridges
Food Services with additional cost for takeout
Sports clothes that are matching jackets and pants
The best equivalent to Eastman Kodak's strategy of selling the Brownie camera for a low price and making money through photo processing today would be printers and ink cartridges.
Printers are often sold at a relatively low cost compared to the ongoing expense of purchasing ink cartridges. Printer manufacturers adopt a similar approach to Eastman Kodak by offering affordable printing hardware to customers with the knowledge that they will continue to generate revenue from the sale of ink cartridges, which need to be replaced regularly. In this model, the profit margins are higher on the consumable supplies rather than the initial device purchase.
Printers are often sold at a relatively low cost compared to the ongoing expense of purchasing ink cartridges. Printer manufacturers adopt a similar approach to Eastman Kodak by offering affordable printing hardware to customers with the knowledge that they will continue to generate revenue from the sale of ink cartridges, which need to be replaced regularly. In this model, the profit margins are higher on the consumable supplies rather than the initial device purchase.