The following options are best explained why a business shouldn't improve efficiency by laying off the oldest and therefore highest-paid employees:
1. This action gives unrealistic hope to those who remain: Laying off long-term, higher-paid employees to improve efficiency may create a false sense of security among the remaining employees. They may believe their jobs are safe, only to be let go later. This can lead to reduced morale and trust within the company.
2. This action violates the WARN Act: The WARN (Worker Adjustment and Retraining Notification) Act is a federal labor law in the United States that requires employers to provide advance notice of mass layoffs or plant closures. If a business lays off a significant number of employees, including older and higher-paid ones, without complying with the WARN Act, they may face legal consequences.
3. This action discriminates illegally: Age discrimination is prohibited by various laws in many countries, such as the Age Discrimination in Employment Act (ADEA) in the United States. Laying off older employees solely based on their age or compensation violates these anti-discrimination laws, potentially resulting in legal implications for the business.
In summary, these options highlight ethical, legal, and discriminatory concerns associated with laying off older and higher-paid employees solely for the purpose of improving efficiency.
which of the following best explains why shouldnt a business improve efficency by laying off the oldest and therefore highest paid employees
this action gives unrealistic hope to those who remain
this action given employees too many choices
this action violates the WARN act
this action discriminates illegally
1 answer