There are multiple reasons why a business should not improve efficiency by laying off the oldest and highest-paid employees. Among the options you provided, the following seem to provide valid explanations:
1. This action gives unrealistic hope to those who remain: If a business lays off its oldest and highest-paid employees, it may create a false sense of job security for the remaining employees. They may believe that their jobs are safe, but in reality, the business may continue to prioritize cost-cutting measures, putting their jobs at risk as well.
2. This action violates the WARN Act: The Worker Adjustment and Retraining Notification (WARN) Act in the United States requires employers with 100 or more employees to provide advance notice of layoff or plant closure. By laying off the oldest employees, the business may not comply with the legal obligations outlined in the WARN Act.
3. This action discriminates illegally: If the sole reason for laying off the oldest and highest-paid employees is their age or salary, it can be considered illegal discrimination based on age or pay. Age discrimination laws protect employees from unfair treatment based on their age, while discriminating based on pay can violate equal pay or wage discrimination laws.
It is important to note that other potential reasons could come into play when discussing this topic, such as the importance of experience and knowledge held by older employees or potential negative public image and backlash a company may face for targeting older employees.
which of the following explains why whouldnt a business improve efficency by laying off the oldest and therefore highest paid employees
this action gives unrealistic hope to those who remain
this action given employees too many choices
this action violates the WARN act
this action discriminates illegally
1 answer