The correct way to read the analogy is:
a. a poet is to a poem as a baker is to a pie
a. a poet is to a poem as a baker is to a pie
a. "a poet is to a poem as a baker is to a pie"
This sentence correctly uses the structure of "A is to B as C is to D" to establish a relationship between a poet and a poem, as well as a baker and a pie. This is a common format for analogies.
b. "a poet is a type of poem as a baker is a type of pie"
This sentence presents a different type of analogy, suggesting that a poet is a specific type or category of poem, similar to how a baker is a specific type or category of pie. While this is an interesting comparison, it is not synonymous with the relationship between a poet and a poem.
c. "a poet likes poems as a baker ears pies"
This sentence lacks parallel structure and contains grammatical errors ("ears" instead of "hears"). The analogy between a poet and poems, as well as a baker and pies, is not clearly expressed. Therefore, this sentence is not a correct way to read the analogy.
d. "a poem is part of a poet as a pie is part of a baker"
This sentence creates a different analogy, stating that a poem is part of a poet, just as a pie is part of a baker. While this comparison can be valid in certain contexts, it does not align with the analogy where the relationship between a poet and a poem is established.
Based on the analysis, the correct way to read the analogy is option a. "a poet is to a poem as a baker is to a pie."