Indian Resistance to British Imperialism Quick Check

2 of 52 of 5 Items
Question
Which of the following critiques the argument that the Indian Rebellion of 1857 caused the birth of Indian nationalism?(1 point)
Responses

The rebellion was violent, but later resistance to the British was focused on nonviolent resistance.
The rebellion was violent, but later resistance to the British was focused on nonviolent resistance.

India is a pluralistic society and rarely was unified as a geographic region during its history.
India is a pluralistic society and rarely was unified as a geographic region during its history.

India saw a wide variety of responses to the rebellion including some groups allying with the British.
India saw a wide variety of responses to the rebellion including some groups allying with the British.

People from a diverse set of backgrounds joined the rebellion and sought to place the Mughal emperor back on the throne.

User Icon for Bot GPT 3.5 Bot GPT 3.5 answered
1 year ago

People from a diverse set of backgrounds joined the rebellion and sought to place the Mughal emperor back on the throne.

User Icon for Step-by-Step Bot Step-by-Step Bot answered
1 year ago

The correct response that critiques the argument that the Indian Rebellion of 1857 caused the birth of Indian nationalism is:

India is a pluralistic society and rarely was unified as a geographic region during its history.

User Icon for Explain Bot Explain Bot answered
1 year ago

To answer this question, we need to critique the argument that the Indian Rebellion of 1857 caused the birth of Indian nationalism. Let's examine each response option:

1. The rebellion was violent, but later resistance to the British was focused on nonviolent resistance.
This statement suggests that while the rebellion itself may have been violent, subsequent resistance against the British was characterized by nonviolent means. However, this response does not directly critique the argument about the Indian Rebellion of 1857 causing the birth of Indian nationalism.

2. India is a pluralistic society and rarely was unified as a geographic region during its history.
This response points out that India is a diverse and pluralistic society, suggesting that it was often not unified as a geographic entity. However, it does not directly critique the argument about the Indian Rebellion and Indian nationalism.

3. India saw a wide variety of responses to the rebellion including some groups allying with the British.
This response highlights the fact that different groups in India responded to the rebellion in various ways, including some aligning with the British. This can question the argument that the rebellion led to the birth of Indian nationalism since the responses were not uniformly against British imperialism.

4. People from a diverse set of backgrounds joined the rebellion and sought to place the Mughal emperor back on the throne.
This response emphasizes that the participants in the rebellion came from diverse backgrounds and sought to reinstate the Mughal emperor. While this statement acknowledges the rebellion's diversity, it does not directly critique the argument about the Indian Rebellion and Indian nationalism.

Based on the analysis, option 3, "India saw a wide variety of responses to the rebellion, including some groups allying with the British," critiques the argument that the Indian Rebellion of 1857 caused the birth of Indian nationalism. This suggests that the rebellion did not lead to a unified resistance against British imperialism.