A strong paragraph includes a minimum of three to five details from the lesson and is written in Academic English form. For more information on Academic English form, refer to the documents in the Orientation.
1. GRAND JURY REFUSES TO HAND DOWN INDICTMENT IN SLANDER CASE
2. POLICE HAD NO WARRANT TO SEIZE DRUGS.
3. WITNESS REFUSES TO TALK TO GRAND JURY - "PLEADS FIFTH"
4. TRAFFIC TICKETS ISSUED AFTER CAMERAS RECORD VIOLATIONS
This is a tricky one! Think about what this headline states. Then provide an explanation of why AND/OR why this may or may not be a violation.
5. BUSINESS CLOSES AFTER PATRONS COMPLAIN OF THE OWNER'S POLITICAL AND RELIGIOUS BELIEFS.
1 answer
In a recent case of slander, a grand jury has made the decision to not hand down an indictment. This highlights the lack of evidence or credibility in the alleged claims, with the individuals involved failing to provide substantial proof. Furthermore, it raises questions about the veracity of the accusations and the potential motivations behind them. Additionally, the absence of a warrant during the seizure of drugs by the police brings into question the legality of this action. This violation of proper procedure could potentially result in the evidence being deemed inadmissible in court. Moreover, it raises concerns about law enforcement abusing their powers and infringing upon individuals' rights. Moving on, a witness choosing to "plead the fifth" during a grand jury investigation suggests their refusal to incriminate themselves. This hints at their potential involvement in illegal activities and their desire to protect themselves from being prosecuted. Additionally, it emphasizes the complexity of the case and the necessity for thorough investigation to uncover the truth. The issuance of traffic tickets following the recording of violations by cameras raises concerns regarding the violation of privacy and the potential for inaccuracies in the system. It begs the question of whether the use of technology in law enforcement sacrifices individual rights and subjective judgement. Lastly, the closure of a business due to complaints about the owner's political and religious beliefs raises important ethical and legal considerations. While individuals have the right to express their opinions, the impact these beliefs may have on their business and its patrons should be carefully examined. This situation raises questions about the limits of free speech and discrimination, as the decision to close the business could be seen as both a valid response to customer concerns or an unjust restriction on the owner's rights.
1 answer