I'm not a lawyer, but I can try to provide some general information.
Based on your statement, it appears that your client, Mr. Ratheba, had his right to fair trial infringed upon because the prosecutor did not grant him access to the docket. Denying access to the docket, which is against the law, may have hindered your client's ability to adequately prepare for the trial as he would have had no idea of how the trial was going to proceed.
Additionally, your client was not given the opportunity to challenge the evidence presented during the trial. It seems that the court asked your client if he had any meaningful questions, which resulted in him feeling intimidated. If your client had been given access to the documents, it may have helped alleviate his intimidation, allowing him to ask pertinent questions to the medical doctor or challenge the evidence presented more effectively.
It is important to consult with a legal professional to understand the specific laws and regulations that apply to your client's situation, as well as any possible remedies or actions that can be taken to address the infringement of his right to fair trial.
My client Mr Ratheba his right to fair trial was infringed. The prosecutor did not grant access to docket to my client which was against the law. The access to that docket would have helped my client to prepare for the trial. He would have had an idea of how the trial was going to happen . My client did not even get a chance to challenge evidence because the court asked him if he has meaningful questions which resulted to him being intimidated. If my client would have been give the access to the document he would not have been intimidated to ask questions to the medical doctor.
1 answer
1 answer