Question

Hey Bot, Which expression is correctly developed to use the Product Rule of Exponents?(1 point)
Responses

327
32 superscript 7 baseline

(52)9
left parenthesis 5 squared right parenthesis superscript 9 baseline

62⋅73
6 squared times 7 cubed

108⋅108
10 superscript 8 baseline times 10 superscript 8 baseline
Answer
Which of the following correctly used the Product Rule of Exponents to simplify the expression 1008⋅1007?(1 point)
Responses

10056
100 superscript 56 baseline

10,00015
10,000 superscript 15 baseline

10015
100 superscript 15 baseline

20015
Answer
Find the numerical equivalent of 102 ⋅103(1 point)
Responses

100,000
100,000

105
10 superscript 5 baseline

10
10

1,100
1,100
Answer
thats not an answer
Answer
thats still not correct. The options are:

100,000

105
10 superscript 5 baseline

10

1,100
Answer
Find the numerical equivalent of 2 subscript 5 times 2 subscript −2
(1 point)
Responses

2
2

8
8

128
128

16
16
Answer
Find the numerical equivalent of 4 subscript 9 times 4 subscript −7
(1 point)
Responses

4
4

16
16

42
4 squared

416
Answer
Use the Product Rule of Exponents to simplify the expression 2 subscript 4 ⋅2 subscript 2.
(1 point)
Answer
Use the Product Rule of Exponents to simplify the expression 3 subscript 8 ⋅3 subscript 3.
(1 point)
Answer
Use the Product Rule of Exponents to simplify the expression 7 subscript 5 ⋅7 subscript 2.
(1 point)
Answer
Find the numerical equivalent of 7 subscript 5⋅7 subscript 3 (1 point)
Answer
Find the numerical equivalent of 3 subscript 9⋅3 subscript −5
(1 point)
Answered by GPT 3.5
The expression 62⋅73 (6 squared times 7 cubed) is correctly developed to use the Product Rule of Exponents.
Answered by GPT 3.5
The correct option that uses the Product Rule of Exponents to simplify the expression 1008⋅1007 is 10015 (100 superscript 15 baseline).
Answered by GPT 3.5
The numerical equivalent of 102 ⋅103 is 10,000 (10000).
Answered by GPT 3.5
Apologies for the mistake. The correct numerical equivalent of 102 ⋅ 103 is 1,000.
Answered by GPT 3.5
Apologies for the errors.
The correct numerical equivalent of 102 ⋅ 103 is 1,000,000 (100,000).
Answered by GPT 3.5
The numerical equivalent of 2 subscript 5 times 2 subscript −2 is 8 (8).
Answered by GPT 3.5
The numerical equivalent of 4 subscript 9 times 4 subscript −7 is 16 (16).
Answered by GPT 3.5
To simplify the expression 2 subscript 4 ⋅ 2 subscript 2 using the Product Rule of Exponents, we add the exponents since the bases are the same.
2 subscript 4 ⋅ 2 subscript 2 = 2 subscript (4+2) = 2 subscript 6
Answered by GPT 3.5
To simplify the expression 3 subscript 8 ⋅ 3 subscript 3 using the Product Rule of Exponents, we add the exponents since the bases are the same.
3 subscript 8 ⋅ 3 subscript 3 = 3 subscript (8+3) = 3 subscript 11
Answered by GPT 3.5
To simplify the expression 7 subscript 5 ⋅ 7 subscript 2 using the Product Rule of Exponents, we add the exponents since the bases are the same.
7 subscript 5 ⋅ 7 subscript 2 = 7 subscript (5+2) = 7 subscript 7
Answered by GPT 3.5
To find the numerical equivalent of 7 subscript 5 ⋅ 7 subscript 3, we multiply the base (7) raised to the sum of the exponents (5+3):
7 subscript 5 ⋅ 7 subscript 3 = 7^(5+3) = 7^8 = 5,764,801
Answered by GPT 3.5
To find the numerical equivalent of 3 subscript 9 ⋅ 3 subscript −5, we divide the base (3) raised to the first exponent (9) by the base (3) raised to the second exponent (-5):

3 subscript 9 ⋅ 3 subscript −5 = (3^9) / (3^-5)

Using the quotient rule of exponents, we subtract the exponents:

3 subscript 9 ⋅ 3 subscript −5 = 3^(9 - (-5))

Simplifying the exponents:

3 subscript 9 ⋅ 3 subscript −5 = 3^(9 + 5) = 3^14

Therefore, the numerical equivalent of 3 subscript 9 ⋅ 3 subscript −5 is 3^14.