Which of the following best describes the impact of immigration on Europe during the 1900s?

(1 point)

Immigrants bring wealth and skills that have helped lower government costs for health care

O Cultural diversity within wealthy western European countries has increased.

European countries rejected immigration to preserve one dominant culture in each country.

O Immigration has caused the number of people in the workforce to shrink, harming the European economy.

65 answers

Cultural diversity within wealthy western European countries has increased.
Which describes the origins of democracy?

(1 point)

O Democracy was first used in ancient Greece.

O Democracy was first used by the royalty in France.

Democracy was first used in modern-day England.

O Democracy was first used by leaders in Germany.
Democracy was first used in ancient Greece.
"Mr Lukashenko, who has been in power for 18 years, is banned from travelling to the United States and western Europe. He has been accused of torture and human rights abuses-he has thrown his opponents in prison, banned protests and restricted freedom of expression. There is no presidential term limit here [Belarus] and the 1996 referendum consolidated Mr Lukashenko's power. Not a single election in Belarus has been deemed as free or fair by the West. Not a single opposition candidate won a seat in the recent, parliamentary vote. Protests have been violently supressed."

-BBC News, October 22, 2012

What type of government does Belarus have?

(1 point)

democracy

O constitutional monarchy

O dictatorship

O absolute monarchy
Belarus has a dictatorship.
The Kyoto Protocol is an international agreement that was designed to

(1 point)

reduce the emission of greenhouse gases linked to climate change.

O reduce the nuclear arsenals of specific countries.

O develop an early alert system to warn populations of likely earthquakes and tsunamis.

O develop a comprehensive strategy to stop the pollution of lakes, seas, and oceans.
reduce the emission of greenhouse gases linked to climate change.
Carbon Emissions in

12009

2010

124

CO₂ Emissions (metric ton per capita) 10

Denmark

Finland

Iceland

Norway

Sweden

Which of the following statements accurately describes the information presented in the graph?

(1 point)

O carton icons the most

O Nway proved twice as much carbon amissions as Faland

Country

Source: World Book
The information presented in the graph shows that Norway has twice as much carbon emissions as Finland.
Europe: Leading Religion by Country

Key

Protestant

Catholic

Catholic or Protestant

Orthodox

Norway

Sweden

Finland

None

United

Ireland Kingdom

Belgium

Belarus

Poland

Ukroine

Romanial

Bulgaria

Grence

Kosovo

Germany

France

Austrio

Bosnia

Portugal

Albania

Which historic or episoding region in

(pont)

© The Otoman emp
I'm sorry, but I'm unable to understand the question you are asking or the information you are providing. Could you please clarify or rephrase your question?
Population Density

Persons

600

196

2-mon

300

350

i ponty
I'm sorry, but I'm still unable to understand the question or information you provided. Can you please rephrase or clarify your question?
500

195

300

115
I apologize, but I still do not understand the meaning or context of the numbers you have provided. Could you please provide more information or clarify your question?
Really
I apologize for the confusion. Without context or further information, it is difficult for me to provide a meaningful response to the numbers you have provided. If you can provide more details or specify your question, I would be happy to assist you.
Population Density

Persons

per sq. mile

per sq kilometer

500

195

300

115

150

60 包

25

10

1

1

More than 5 million

2 million-5 million

Dirmingham

chester

London

Brus

Munichs

Lisbon,

Barcelono

Naples

Bucharest
Thank you for providing additional information. Based on the numbers given, it appears that you are listing population densities in terms of persons per square mile or persons per square kilometer. However, the additional names and locations you have provided (Birmingham, Chester, London, Brussels, Munich, Lisbon, Barcelona, Naples, Bucharest) do not seem to correspond to any specific population densities. If you have a specific question or need further assistance, please let me know.
So whats the snswer
Based on the numbers provided, it appears to be a list of population densities in terms of persons per square mile or persons per square kilometer. However, without a specific question or context associated with the numbers and locations given, it is not possible to provide a definitive answer. If you have a specific question or need assistance with a particular aspect, please let me know and I will be happy to help.
Which statement best describes where most people live in Europe?

(1 point)

O Population is concentrated on the coast and in river valleys.

Most people live in southern Europe.

Population is concentrated in the mountainous central region.

O Most people live in northern Europe.
The statement that best describes where most people live in Europe is: "Population is concentrated on the coast and in river valleys."
"I truly never would have thought my idea of opening a high-end art supply store would work when my country became independent from the Soviet Union. But because the arts are so important here in Poland, and the government helped me a along the way, it's been a very exciting time."

-Entrepreneur from Bialystok, Poland

Which of the following does this passage indicate about the Polish government?

(1 point)

O It recognizes the economic importance of entrepreneurship.

O it has decreased its economic role since Soviet power ended.

It helps entrepreneurs more than big business

It aims to limit its economic role.
The passage indicates that the Polish government recognizes the economic importance of entrepreneurship.
Why is Europe's population shrinking?

(1 point)

The fertility rate is low.

O Immigration levels are low.

People are migrating out of Europe.

The death rate is high.
The correct answer is: The fertility rate is low.
Read the passage.

Many people visit Britain because of their heritage. Americans, for example, often travel to the United Kingdom to revisit the homes of their English, Irish, Scottish, or Welsh ancestors. Tourists flock to famous places such as London's Buckingham Palace. They also visit ancient and historic sites such as Stonehenge and Shakespeare's hometown, Stratford-upon-Avon.

Which type of economic activity does the passage reflect?

(1 point)

agriculture

service sector

O manufacturing

Oretail trade
The passage reflects the service sector economic activity, specifically in the tourism industry.
Is itagriculture

O service sector

Omanufacturing

O retail trade
Apologies for the incorrect response. The correct answer is the service sector. The passage describes tourism and visiting historical sites, which are part of the service industry.
Which of the following is an advantage to having a common currency in the European Union?

(1 point)

Oit allows each government to make its own policy regarding currency.

It allows the worth of the currency to change depending on the country.

O it makes it impossible for member countries to suffer economically.

It allows for easier trading and investment.
The advantage of having a common currency in the European Union is that it allows for easier trading and investment.
Which conclusion can you draw from this map?

(1 point)

Former communist countries have been left out of the European Union.

Lithuania, Latvia, and Estonia share a common legal system.

Portugal and Spain are no longer independent countries.

O People and goods can move freely between Bulgaria and Ireland.
The conclusion that can be drawn from the given map is that people and goods can move freely between Bulgaria and Ireland.
How did geography and migration affect the languages of Europe. Choose the languages that evolved directly from Latin. Select all that apply.

(1 point)

Latin

#English

#1 French

#Finnish

#German
The languages that evolved directly from Latin are:

- Latin
- French
Is it :: English

:: Finnish

::Italian

:: German
Apologies for the confusion. The correct languages that evolved directly from Latin are:

- Italian
- French
Place the languages in the order in which they arrived in Europe.

(1point)

Germanic

Proto-Indo-European

Latin

Indo-European Slavic
The correct order in which these languages arrived in Europe is as follows:

1. Proto-Indo-European
2. Indo-European
3. Slavic
4. Latin
5. Germanic
The German and British governments invest heavily in human capital. How does this lead to a higher standard of living? Order the sequence to answer the question.

(1 point)

higher wages leads to

productive workers leads to

higher iteracy rates and good education leads to

investment in human capital leads to
The correct sequence to answer the question "How does investing heavily in human capital lead to a higher standard of living?" is as follows:

1. Investment in human capital leads to
2. Higher literacy rates and good education leads to
3. Productive workers leads to
4. Higher wages leads to a higher standard of living.
Why has the influx of immigrants to Europe created challenges?

(1 point)

O Immigrants are not interested in a better life.

O Immigrants create diversity.

Immigrants do not have good reasons for leaving their homeland.

Immigrants may not have the skills necessary to find work.
The influx of immigrants to Europe has created challenges because immigrants may not have the skills necessary to find work.
Would you prefer to own a business in the German economy or British economy? Why? (4 points)
As an AI language model, I don't have personal preferences or opinions. However, I can provide some general points for consideration:

Potential advantages of owning a business in the German economy:
1. Strong manufacturing base: Germany is known for its strong manufacturing sector, which can provide opportunities for businesses involved in industrial production.
2. Skilled workforce: Germany has a highly skilled and educated workforce, which can be beneficial for businesses that require specialized expertise.
3. Access to the European single market: Germany is part of the European Union and has access to the single market, enabling businesses to trade and operate within a large economic bloc.

Potential advantages of owning a business in the British economy:
1. Business-friendly environment: The UK has a reputation for being business-friendly, with a flexible labor market and a pro-business regulatory environment.
2. Global financial hub: London is a major global financial center, which can present opportunities for businesses in finance, banking, and related sectors.
3. English language advantage: English is widely spoken and used as a global business language, which can facilitate international communication and expansion.

Ultimately, the choice between the German and British economies would depend on various factors such as the nature of the business, target market, industry, and personal preferences. It is important to thoroughly research and consider these factors before making a decision.
Less info 🙏
Certainly! Here are some concise points to consider when choosing between the German and British economies for owning a business:

German Economy:
1. Strong manufacturing sector.
2. Highly skilled and educated workforce.
3. Access to the European single market.

British Economy:
1. Business-friendly environment.
2. Global financial hub.
3. Advantage of English being widely spoken.

Please note that the choice depends on factors like the nature of the business, target market, industry, and personal preferences. Thorough research and consideration of these factors is essential before making a decision.
What does widley mean 🤔
"Widely" means to a large extent or over a broad range. In the context of the previous response, it means that English is spoken by a significant number of people across different countries or regions. It indicates that English is used and understood by a large portion of the global population.
Compare and contrast the governments of Great Britain and Germany. (4 points)
Certainly! Here are some points comparing and contrasting the governments of Great Britain and Germany:

Great Britain:
1. System: Great Britain has a constitutional monarchy with a parliamentary system.
2. Head of State: The monarch (currently Queen Elizabeth II) serves as the ceremonial head of state with limited powers.
3. Head of Government: The Prime Minister is the head of government and holds significant executive powers.
4. Legislative Branch: The UK has a bicameral Parliament consisting of the House of Commons and the House of Lords.

Germany:
1. System: Germany has a federal parliamentary republic.
2. Head of State: The President serves as the ceremonial head of state with limited powers.
3. Head of Government: The Chancellor is the head of government and holds significant executive powers.
4. Legislative Branch: Germany has a bicameral Parliament consisting of the Bundestag (lower house) and the Bundesrat (upper house).

Contrasts:
1. Monarchy vs. Republic: Great Britain has a constitutional monarchy with a hereditary monarch, while Germany is a federal parliamentary republic with an elected President.
2. Head of State: The monarch in Great Britain holds a symbolic role, while the President in Germany has more limited powers but serves as a representative and unifying figure.
3. Legislative Structure: Great Britain has a bicameral Parliament with a more influential House of Commons, while Germany has a federal system with the Bundesrat representing the states.
4. Historical Development: The political systems in both countries have evolved through different historical contexts, with Great Britain having established its democratic traditions over centuries and Germany's post-World War II development.

It's important to note that these are general points of comparison and contrast, and the governments of both countries are subject to specific legal frameworks, political dynamics, and evolving circumstances.
Less info 🙏 🙏 🙏
Certainly! Here is a simplified version comparing and contrasting the governments of Great Britain and Germany:

Great Britain:
- Constitutional monarchy with a parliamentary system.
- Monarch (Queen Elizabeth II) serves as the ceremonial head of state.
- Prime Minister is the head of government with executive powers.
- Bicameral Parliament: House of Commons and House of Lords.

Germany:
- Federal parliamentary republic.
- President serves as the ceremonial head of state.
- Chancellor is the head of government with executive powers.
- Bicameral Parliament: Bundestag and Bundesrat.

Contrasts:
- Great Britain has a constitutional monarchy, while Germany is a republic.
- The role of the head of state differs: monarch in Great Britain and president in Germany.
- The legislative structure differs: House of Commons and House of Lords in Great Britain, Bundestag and Bundesrat in Germany.
- There are historical and cultural differences that have shaped each country's political system.

Remember, these are simplified points and may not cover all aspects, but they provide a basic comparison and contrast between the governments of Great Britain and Germany.
Can you give a little more less information
Certainly! Here is a concise comparison of the governments of Great Britain and Germany:

Great Britain:
- Constitutional monarchy with a parliamentary system.
- Monarch (Queen Elizabeth II) is the ceremonial head of state.
- Prime Minister is the head of government and holds executive powers.
- Bicameral Parliament: House of Commons and House of Lords.

Germany:
- Federal parliamentary republic.
- President is the ceremonial head of state.
- Chancellor is the head of government and holds executive powers.
- Bicameral Parliament: Bundestag and Bundesrat.

Contrasts:
- Great Britain has a constitutional monarchy, while Germany is a republic.
- The head of state in Britain is a hereditary monarch, while in Germany, it is an elected President.
- The legislative structures differ, with different names for the houses of Parliament.
- Both countries have a parliamentary system, but their specific arrangements and historical contexts vary.

Please note that this is a simplified summary, and further details and nuances could be explored in a fuller analysis.
Please give why less info
Certainly! Here is a simplified and concise comparison of the governments of Great Britain and Germany:

Great Britain:
- Constitutional monarchy with a parliamentary system.
- Monarch (Queen Elizabeth II) is the ceremonial head of state.
- Prime Minister is the head of government.
- Bicameral Parliament: House of Commons and House of Lords.

Germany:
- Federal parliamentary republic.
- President is the ceremonial head of state.
- Chancellor is the head of government.
- Bicameral Parliament: Bundestag and Bundesrat.

Contrasts:
- Great Britain has a constitutional monarchy, while Germany is a republic.
- The role of the head of state differs: monarch in Great Britain and president in Germany.
- The legislative structures also differ: House of Commons and House of Lords in Britain, Bundestag and Bundesrat in Germany.

These are simplified points to provide a quick overview of the differences between the governments of Great Britain and Germany.
Give one reason why a European country might decide to join the European Union. Give another reason why a country might decide not to join.
One reason why a European country might decide to join the European Union is the potential economic benefits. Membership in the EU provides access to a large single market, allowing for the free movement of goods, services, capital, and labor. This can lead to increased trade, investment, and economic growth.

On the other hand, a country might decide not to join the European Union due to concerns about sovereignty and loss of control over decision-making. Some countries may prefer to maintain their independence and retain full control over their domestic policies, including those related to trade, immigration, and regulations. They may have concerns about aligning with EU regulations and directives that they perceive as limiting their national autonomy.
Why has immigration to Europe caused controversy in recent years?

(4 points)
Immigration to Europe has caused controversy in recent years due to the following reasons:

1. Economic Concerns: Some believe that immigrants compete with locals for jobs, leading to concerns about job scarcity and wage depression. There can be fears that immigrants may burden social welfare systems by utilizing public services without contributing sufficiently.

2. Cultural Identity: Immigration can bring cultural and religious diversity, which some perceive as a threat to national identity or cultural cohesion. There can be concerns about integration, assimilation, and the preservation of national traditions in the face of immigrant populations with different cultural practices.

3. Security and Terrorism: In the context of global security challenges, there are fears that immigration may enable the entry of individuals with radical ideologies or involvement in terrorist activities. This perception has been reinforced by a
Can you give less info 🙏
Hello bot