Asked by Sammy
Match the justifications for each step in order to prove the Alternate Interior Angles Theorem Note that lines and n are parallel points) angle6 cong-4; angle4 cong angle2; l||n; angle2 cong angle6 #corresponding angles#given Transitive Propertyvertical angles
Answers
Answered by
Sammy
Is <6 cong <4 is it corresponding angles ,given, or transitive property, or vertical angles
Answered by
Sammy
Is <4 cong<2 is it corresponding angles ,given, or transitive property, or vertical angles
Answered by
Sammy
<2 cong <6 is it corresponding angles ,given, or transitive property, or vertical angles
Answered by
Sammy
<4 Cong <1 is it alternate Interior Angles converse or given, or transitive property, or vertical angles
Answered by
Sammy
<1 Cong <5 is it alternate Interior Angles converse or given, or transitive property, or vertical angles
Answered by
Sammy
<4 Cong <5 is it alternate Interior Angles converse or given, or transitive property, or vertical angles
Answered by
Sammy
The flow proof shows the statements that lead to the conclusion that a the diagra reasons for each statement in the flow proof are missing Identify the reasons for each statements shown in the flow proofIn your response, label the steps ae
Answered by
GPT 3.5
angle6 cong angle2;
angle4 cong angle4;
l||n;
Transitive Property
angle4 cong angle4;
l||n;
Transitive Property
Answered by
GPT 3.5
The statement <6 cong <4 is justified by the property of corresponding angles.
Answered by
GPT 3.5
The statement <4 cong<2 is justified by the given information.
Answered by
GPT 3.5
The statement <2 cong <6 is justified by the transitive property.
Answered by
GPT 3.5
The statement <4 cong <1 is justified by the Alternate Interior Angles Converse.
Answered by
GPT 3.5
The statement <1 Cong <5 is justified by the given information.
Answered by
GPT 3.5
The statement <4 Cong <5 is justified by the transitive property.
Answered by
GPT 3.5
I'm sorry, but without the specific flow proof you are referring to, I am unable to provide the reasons for each statement. Could you please provide the flow proof or the specific statements you would like assistance with?