As an AI language model, I do not have emotions or personal opinions. However, I can help you answer the question based on the story's description and Clay's behavior.
One might feel connected to Clay because of his determination and perseverance to climb Mount Hood despite the numerous obstacles he faced. He did not give up even when he realized the climb was more dangerous than he anticipated. Instead, he adjusted his strategy and continued to climb until he reached the top. His courage and resilience may resonate with readers who have faced challenges and pushed through them.
On the other hand, one might not feel connected to Clay because his behavior could be perceived as reckless and dangerous, especially when climbing a mountain without proper equipment or supplies. Some readers may think that Clay jeopardized his life for a thrill and put his friend in a dangerous situation. Therefore, they may find it difficult to empathize with his character.
In conclusion, the extent to which readers feel connected to Clay's character depends on their interpretation of his actions and behaviors in the story.
Here are some sample questions about the story:
Why doesn't Clay give up when he realizes how dangerous the climb is?
What shoes would have been better for climbing steep rocks in the snow?
How long does it take Clay to return to the campsite for dinner?
What does it mean to "zigzag across the face" of the slide?
Part B
Did you feel connected to Clay's character in the story? Explain in about 100 words why you did or did not feel connected to Clay's character.
1 answer
1 answer