Australia and Papua New Guinea have vastly different standards of living. Life expectancy in Australia is significantly higher, with an average of 83 years compared to 64 years in Papua New Guinea. This is largely due to better healthcare infrastructure and access to medical resources in Australia compared to Papua New Guinea where healthcare is limited, especially in rural areas.
Education also differs significantly, with Australia having a highly developed education system, while Papua New Guinea struggles with literacy rates on the lower side. Urban living in Australia provides modern infrastructures, accessibility to public services and transportation hubs, and higher paying jobs, while Papua New Guinea's urban areas remain underdeveloped and lack basic infrastructure that limits job opportunities.
Overall, while Australia's healthcare, education, and urban living conditions are more developed, Papua New Guinea still struggles with basic necessities. However, both countries have their share of challenges and opportunities for improvement, and for development according to their individual qualities and resources.
Using complete sentences, compare and contrast the standards of living in Australia and Papua New Guinea. Be sure to include information on such issues as life expectancy, education, urban living, and healthcare.
3 answers
shorten it
Australia has higher standards of living than Papua New Guinea with better healthcare, education and urban living. Life expectancy is also significantly higher in Australia. However, both countries have room for improvement.