In 3-5 sentences, explain at least three questions that could be asked to determine whether news programs and

documentaries are accurate and reliable sources of information

3 answers

1. What sources does the program or documentary use to support its claims?
2. Has the information presented been fact-checked or verified by reputable sources?
3. Are there any conflicting perspectives or viewpoints presented, and if so, are they addressed and given equal consideration?
And what else?
4. What is the reputation of the news program or documentary producer? Have they been known to present biased or misleading information in the past?
5. Is the information presented in a balanced and objective manner, or is there a clear bias or agenda present?
6. Have experts in the relevant field been consulted or interviewed to provide insight and analysis?
7. Are there any red flags, such as sensationalized headlines or overly dramatic language, that suggest the program or documentary may be more interested in entertainment than presenting accurate information?
8. Does the program or documentary provide evidence to back up its claims, and is that evidence credible and reliable?
9. Are there any potential conflicts of interest that could be influencing the information presented, such as financial ties between the producer and a particular industry or organization?
10. Are there any major factual errors or inconsistencies within the program or documentary that suggest it may not be a reliable source of information?