Asked by call me
Which best explains why (-4) = 4
Answers
Answered by
call me
How many times greater is the value of the 2 in 270,413 than the value of the 2 in 419,427
Answered by
call me
Which expression has a value equal to 28 divided by 4
Answered by
call me
how many 1/16 - pound servings are there in a bag of almonds that weighs 3/4 pound
Answered by
call me
Last week crista spent 2 3/4 hours playing piano. this week she spent 3 2/4 hours playing piano. how much more time did she play piano this week?
Answered by
call me
so, what's the total hours.
Answered by
call me
use the drop down menu to order the decimals from greatest to least
Answered by
call me
use the drop down menu to order the decimals from greatest to least 8.31 8.296 8.06 8.3
Answered by
call me
4/5 divided 3/4 =
Answered by
call me
how many rays are in the figure
Answered by
call me
How many parallel sides can a triangle have
Answered by
Bot
As an AI language model, I cannot say that (-4) equals 4 because that is not mathematically correct. (-4) is a negative number and 4 is a positive number. They are not equal to each other unless there is a specific mathematical operation or context involved. Please provide more information on the problem to explain the possible reasoning behind this statement.
Answered by
Bot
The value of each digit in a number is determined by its place value.
In the number 270,413:
- The value of the first 2 (from the right) is 2 units or 2
- The value of the second 2 (from the left) is 2 hundreds or 200
In the number 419,427:
- The value of the first 2 (from the right) is 2 ten-thousands or 20,000
- The value of the second 2 (from the left) is 2 thousands or 2,000
To find out how many times greater the value of the 2 in 270,413 is than the value of the 2 in 419,427, we need to divide the value of the 2 in 270,413 by the value of the 2 in 419,427:
200 ÷ 2,000 = 0.1
Therefore, the value of the 2 in 270,413 is 0.1 times (or 1/10th) the value of the 2 in 419,427.
Alternatively, we can say that the value of the 2 in 419,427 is 10 times greater than the value of the 2 in 270,413.
In the number 270,413:
- The value of the first 2 (from the right) is 2 units or 2
- The value of the second 2 (from the left) is 2 hundreds or 200
In the number 419,427:
- The value of the first 2 (from the right) is 2 ten-thousands or 20,000
- The value of the second 2 (from the left) is 2 thousands or 2,000
To find out how many times greater the value of the 2 in 270,413 is than the value of the 2 in 419,427, we need to divide the value of the 2 in 270,413 by the value of the 2 in 419,427:
200 ÷ 2,000 = 0.1
Therefore, the value of the 2 in 270,413 is 0.1 times (or 1/10th) the value of the 2 in 419,427.
Alternatively, we can say that the value of the 2 in 419,427 is 10 times greater than the value of the 2 in 270,413.
Answered by
Bot
The expression that has a value equal to 28 divided by 4 is:
28/4
This can also be simplified to:
7
Therefore, the expression that has the same value as 28 divided by 4 is 7.
28/4
This can also be simplified to:
7
Therefore, the expression that has the same value as 28 divided by 4 is 7.
Answered by
Bot
To find the number of 1/16-pound servings in a 3/4-pound bag of almonds, we need to divide the weight of the bag by the weight of one serving:
3/4 ÷ 1/16
To divide by a fraction, we multiply by its reciprocal (invert and multiply):
3/4 ÷ 1/16 = 3/4 × 16/1 = 48/4
Now we can simplify the fraction by dividing the numerator and denominator by their greatest common factor, which is 4:
48/4 = 12
Therefore, there are 12 servings of 1/16 pound in a bag of almonds that weighs 3/4 pound.
3/4 ÷ 1/16
To divide by a fraction, we multiply by its reciprocal (invert and multiply):
3/4 ÷ 1/16 = 3/4 × 16/1 = 48/4
Now we can simplify the fraction by dividing the numerator and denominator by their greatest common factor, which is 4:
48/4 = 12
Therefore, there are 12 servings of 1/16 pound in a bag of almonds that weighs 3/4 pound.
Answered by
Bot
To find out how much more time Crista played piano this week, we need to subtract the time she spent playing piano this week from the time she spent playing piano last week:
3 2/4 hours = 3 + 2/4 hours = 3 + 1/2 hours = 3.5 hours
2 3/4 hours = 2 + 3/4 hours = 2.75 hours
3.5 hours - 2.75 hours = 0.75 hours
Therefore, Crista played piano for an additional 0.75 hours, or 45 minutes (since there are 60 minutes in an hour), this week compared to last week.
3 2/4 hours = 3 + 2/4 hours = 3 + 1/2 hours = 3.5 hours
2 3/4 hours = 2 + 3/4 hours = 2.75 hours
3.5 hours - 2.75 hours = 0.75 hours
Therefore, Crista played piano for an additional 0.75 hours, or 45 minutes (since there are 60 minutes in an hour), this week compared to last week.
Answered by
Bot
To find the total hours Crista spent playing piano in both weeks, we need to add the time she spent playing piano last week and the time she spent playing piano this week:
2 3/4 hours = 2 + 3/4 hours = 2.75 hours
3 2/4 hours = 3 + 2/4 hours = 3 + 1/2 hours = 3.5 hours
Total hours = 2.75 hours + 3.5 hours = 6.25 hours
Therefore, Crista spent a total of 6.25 hours playing piano in both weeks.
2 3/4 hours = 2 + 3/4 hours = 2.75 hours
3 2/4 hours = 3 + 2/4 hours = 3 + 1/2 hours = 3.5 hours
Total hours = 2.75 hours + 3.5 hours = 6.25 hours
Therefore, Crista spent a total of 6.25 hours playing piano in both weeks.
Answered by
Bot
I apologize, as an AI language model I'm unable to see any drop-down menu. Please provide me with the decimals you want me to help you sort from greatest to least.
Answered by
Bot
I'm sorry, as an AI language model I cannot see or interact with a dropdown menu. But, I can help you to order the given decimals from greatest to least:
8.31, 8.3, 8.296, 8.06
Therefore, the order from greatest to least is 8.31, 8.3, 8.296, 8.06.
8.31, 8.3, 8.296, 8.06
Therefore, the order from greatest to least is 8.31, 8.3, 8.296, 8.06.
Answered by
Bot
To divide two fractions, we multiply the first fraction by the reciprocal of the second fraction. Therefore,
4/5 ÷ 3/4 = 4/5 × 4/3
We can simplify 4/5 and 4/3 by dividing both numerator and denominator by their greatest common factor, which is 1:
4/5 = 4 ÷ 1 / 5 ÷ 1 = 4/5
4/3 = 4 ÷ 1 / 3 ÷ 1 = 4/3
Substituting these simplified fractions back in the equation:
4/5 ÷ 3/4= 4/5 × 4/3 = 16/15
Therefore, the result of 4/5 ÷ 3/4 is equal to 16/15.
4/5 ÷ 3/4 = 4/5 × 4/3
We can simplify 4/5 and 4/3 by dividing both numerator and denominator by their greatest common factor, which is 1:
4/5 = 4 ÷ 1 / 5 ÷ 1 = 4/5
4/3 = 4 ÷ 1 / 3 ÷ 1 = 4/3
Substituting these simplified fractions back in the equation:
4/5 ÷ 3/4= 4/5 × 4/3 = 16/15
Therefore, the result of 4/5 ÷ 3/4 is equal to 16/15.
Answered by
Bot
It is impossible to determine the number of rays in the figure without a visual representation or a more detailed description of the figure. Please provide more information or a visual representation of the figure for me to accurately count the number of rays in the figure.
Answered by
Bot
A triangle by definition has only three sides. Therefore, a triangle cannot have parallel sides because it only has three non-collinear points, which means that any two sides must intersect at one point (the third vertex) and cannot be parallel.
Submit Your Answer
We prioritize human answers over AI answers.
If you are human, and you can answer this question, please submit your answer.