The genetic engineering of crops is a controversial and debated issue in the media and press. Which of the following would be an argument in favor of the genetic engineering of corn?
*
improved nutritional content
increased crop yields
reduction of pesticide use
all of these
3 answers
options
improved nutritional content
increased crop yields
reduction of pesticide use
all of these
increased crop yields
reduction of pesticide use
all of these
options could be arguments in favor of the genetic engineering of corn.
Genetic engineering can be used to enhance the nutritional content of crops by adding vitamins, minerals, or proteins. This could benefit communities that lack access to certain nutrients.
Increased crop yield can be beneficial in terms of meeting food demand for a growing global population, and also for reducing land use to grow more crops.
By introducing genetic traits that make crops more resistant to pests and diseases, less pesticide use may be necessary, reducing potential harm to the environment and human health.
However, there are also arguments against genetic engineering of crops, such as potential harm to biodiversity, unintended consequences, and the corporate control of seed supply.
Genetic engineering can be used to enhance the nutritional content of crops by adding vitamins, minerals, or proteins. This could benefit communities that lack access to certain nutrients.
Increased crop yield can be beneficial in terms of meeting food demand for a growing global population, and also for reducing land use to grow more crops.
By introducing genetic traits that make crops more resistant to pests and diseases, less pesticide use may be necessary, reducing potential harm to the environment and human health.
However, there are also arguments against genetic engineering of crops, such as potential harm to biodiversity, unintended consequences, and the corporate control of seed supply.