Asked by Addison
The biggest drawback of the need for large amounts of money to campaign is that:
a. people who can not raise money are denied the chance to be elected
b. candidates must use much of their own money in order to get elected
c. PACs (politcal action committees) have a hard time rasing needed funds.
d. getting money from PACs and temporary organizations is a difficult process
Well, I don't think it's B or C.
It could be A but they aren't denied the chance, they just simply don't get elected.
So would it be D? Or keep A,
Input!!
a. people who can not raise money are denied the chance to be elected
b. candidates must use much of their own money in order to get elected
c. PACs (politcal action committees) have a hard time rasing needed funds.
d. getting money from PACs and temporary organizations is a difficult process
Well, I don't think it's B or C.
It could be A but they aren't denied the chance, they just simply don't get elected.
So would it be D? Or keep A,
Input!!
Answers
Answered by
Writeacher
(Note the spelling of "government.")
I think you're right in keeping A.
I think you're right in keeping A.
There are no AI answers yet. The ability to request AI answers is coming soon!
Submit Your Answer
We prioritize human answers over AI answers.
If you are human, and you can answer this question, please submit your answer.