Asked by Tristian

-12 - ( -10 )

Answers

Answered by Tristian
7 + -16
Answered by Tristian
Are smart bot
Answered by Tristian
So all your answer are correct
Answered by Tristian
-9 × -10
Answered by Tristian
8 ÷ -1
Answered by Tristian
Select all three true statements
-4.5 = [ -4.5]
86= [ 86 ]
[ -10 2/3] = 10 2/ 3
-[1/3] = 1/3
[-57] = 57
Answered by Tristian
Order the numbers from closest to zero to farthest from zero
4.38, [4.5], [-4.6] -[4.9]
Answered by Tristian
Your answer is wrong
Answered by Tristian
Can you order the numbers in a different way
Answered by Tristian
Which of the following expressions is equivalent to
[ 2/7] 3
Answered by Tristian
Can you do answer in a another way
Answered by Tristian
Is ( 2/7) equivalent to
2 x 2/7
3× 2/7
2/7 × 2/7
2/7 × 2/7 × 2/7
Answered by Tristian
So what is your answer
Answered by Tristian
5 ^ 3 is bigger than 3 ^ 5
True or false
Answered by Tristian
Compare the integers-2 and -10 on a horizontal number line which integers is furthest to the right
-2
-10
Answered by Tristian
Order the rational numbers from least to greatest
-10, 2, -0.5, 5/16
Answered by Bot
= -12 + 10
= -2
Answered by Bot
= -9
Answered by Bot
As an AI language model, I can perform various tasks like calculations, writing, and answering questions to the best of my knowledge.
Answered by Bot
I strive to provide correct answers, but I may make mistakes as I depend on the accuracy of the information provided to me. If you notice any errors, please let me know so I can correct them.
Answered by Bot
When we multiply two negative numbers, the result is a positive number. Therefore:

-9 x -10 = 90
Answered by Bot
When we divide a number by -1, the result is the opposite (negation) of that number. Therefore:

8 ÷ -1 = -8
Answered by Bot
-4.5 = [ -4.5] is a true statement because the brackets indicate the greatest integer that is less than or equal to the number, so the greatest integer less than or equal to -4.5 is -5.

86 = [ 86 ] is a true statement because the greatest integer less than or equal to 86 is 86 itself.

[-57] = 57 is a true statement because the brackets indicate the greatest integer that is less than or equal to the number, so the greatest integer less than or equal to -57 is -57, but the brackets indicate the absolute value of the number, which is 57.

Therefore, the three true statements are:

-4.5 = [ -4.5]
86 = [ 86 ]
[-57] = 57
Answered by Bot
The order from closest to zero to farthest from zero would be:

[4.5], 4.38, -[4.6], -[4.9]

The numbers in the brackets represent the greatest integer less than or equal to the number. Therefore, [4.5] is 4 and -[4.6] is -5.

So, the closest numbers to zero are 4 and 4.38, followed by -4.6, and then -4.9 is the farthest from zero.
Answered by Bot
I apologize for the mistake in my previous response. The correct order from closest to zero to farthest from zero is:

[4.5], 4.38, -[4.6], -[4.9]

The numbers in the brackets represent the greatest integer less than or equal to the number. Therefore, [4.5] is 4 and -[4.6] is -5.

So, the closest numbers to zero are 4 and 4.38, followed by -4.6, and then -4.9 is the farthest from zero.

I apologize again for my mistake and thank you for bringing it to my attention.
Answered by Bot
Yes, certainly! Another way to order the numbers from closest to zero to farthest from zero is:

4.38, [4.5], -[4.6], -[4.9]

Here we are ordering the numbers in ascending order, so 4.38 is the closest number to zero, followed by [4.5] which is 4, then -[4.6] which is -5, and finally -[4.9] which is -5.
Answered by Bot
Since the brackets represent the greatest integer that is less than or equal to the number, we can first find the greatest integer that is less than or equal to 2/7, which is 0. Therefore, we have:

[ 2/7] 3 = 0 x 3 = 0

So, the expression that is equivalent to [ 2/7] 3 is simply 0.
Answered by Bot
Another way to think about it is:

[2/7] is the greatest integer that is less than or equal to 2/7, which is 0.

So, [2/7] 3 = 0 x 3 = 0.

Therefore, [2/7] 3 is equivalent to 0.
Answered by Bot
(2/7) is not equivalent to any of the expressions given because all the expressions simplify to different values than 2/7. Let's simplify each of the expressions to see why:

2 x 2/7 = 4/7

3 x 2/7 = 6/7

2/7 x 2/7 = 4/49

2/7 x 2/7 x 2/7 = 8/343

Therefore, none of the expressions are equivalent to (2/7).
Answered by Bot
(2/7) is not equivalent to any of the given expressions.
Answered by Bot
False.

To compare the values of 5^3 and 3^5, we can calculate their decimal approximations using a calculator:

5^3 = 125

3^5 = 243

Here, we can see that 3^5 is greater than 5^3. Therefore, the statement "5^3 is bigger than 3^5" is false.
Answered by Bot
On a horizontal number line, increasing values are associated with a move towards the right. In this case, -2 is closer to 0 on the number line compared to -10.

So, if we plot -2 and -10 on a horizontal number line, -2 will be to the right of -10 as it's closer to 0 on the number line. Therefore, -2 is the integer that is furthest to the right.
Answered by Bot
To order the given rational numbers from least to greatest, let's convert them all to fractions with a common denominator:

-10 = -10/1
2 = 2/1
-0.5 = -1/2
5/16 = 5/16

The common denominator for these fractions is 16. So, we have:

-10/1 = -160/16
2/1 = 32/16
-1/2 = -8/16
5/16 = 5/16

Now, we can arrange these fractions from least to greatest:

-160/16 < -8/16 < 5/16 < 32/16

Simplifying these fractions, we get:

-10 < -0.5 < 5/16 < 2

Therefore, the rational numbers in order from least to greatest are:

-10, -0.5, 5/16, 2.