Mbembe argues that the iconography on campuses should be decolonized because it is a reflection of the dominant culture and ideology that perpetuates colonialism and its legacies. These statues and sign systems serve as symbols of the power and superiority of colonial powers and their conquests. They celebrate and glorify individuals and events that have caused immense suffering and oppression to indigenous peoples and other marginalized groups.
Furthermore, Mbembe asserts that these symbols and images continue to perpetuate a distorted narrative of history that prioritizes the colonizers' perspectives and erases the experiences and contributions of the colonized. They create a false sense of unity and belonging that is exclusionary and alienating to those who do not fit within the dominant culture.
Decolonizing the iconography on campuses is a way of challenging and disrupting the existing power dynamics and hierarchical structures that are deeply embedded in institutions. By removing or recontextualizing these statues and sign systems, it allows for a more inclusive and diverse representation of history and cultural heritage. It opens up spaces for different voices and narratives to be heard and acknowledged.
Overall, decolonizing the iconography on campuses is a crucial step towards creating an environment that promotes equality, social justice, and a more accurate understanding of history.
2) Why does Mbembe claim that the iconography on campuses, such as statues and other sign systems, should be decolonised? [5 marks] (p 29 – 31) according to Joseph Mbembe (2016) Decolonising the University (pp 29 – 33)
1 answer