Ask a New Question
Menu

2) How do international treaties differ from international organizations?

11 answers

International treaties and international organizations are two distinct concepts in the realm of international relations, each serving different purposes and functions. Here are the key differences:

International Treaties

  1. Definition: An international treaty is a formal, legally binding agreement between two or more sovereign states or international entities. It is a written document that outlines the rights and obligations of the parties involved.

  2. Purpose: Treaties are primarily designed to govern specific issues or areas of cooperation, such as trade, defense, environmental protection, human rights, and more.

  3. Creation: Treaties are negotiated and signed by the representatives of the states or organizations involved. Once signed, they usually require ratification by the respective governments, often through domestic legislative processes.

  4. Scope: The scope of treaties can be narrow, covering particular topics or areas of concern, or broad, addressing multiple issues within a single agreement.

  5. Examples: Notable examples of international treaties include the Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons (NPT), the Paris Agreement on climate change, and the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS).

International Organizations

  1. Definition: An international organization is an entity established by a group of states or other international actors to pursue common goals, coordinate policy, and facilitate cooperation on a range of issues.

  2. Purpose: International organizations aim to address broad issues that may require ongoing collaboration, such as peace and security, humanitarian assistance, development, and economic cooperation.

  3. Formation: International organizations are typically established through treaties or charters, and they have their own governing structures, rules, and procedures.

  4. Structure and Membership: International organizations usually have a defined membership and a formal organizational structure, which may include various bodies (e.g., assemblies, councils, secretariats) that handle different functions.

  5. Examples: Prominent examples of international organizations include the United Nations (UN), the World Trade Organization (WTO), the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO), and the World Health Organization (WHO).

Summary

In summary, international treaties are specific agreements binding the parties to certain obligations and rights, while international organizations are institutions created to facilitate cooperation and coordination among member states on a wide range of issues. Treaties often serve as the legal framework for the activities and goals of international organizations.

Does this answer anything or no?

Rights treaties may serve as fundamental building blocks to practices of family engagement (Connolly, 2009). Shared attitudes and beliefs of practitioners will shape whether and how international human rights treaties become part of child welfare decision-making practices.As Connolly (2009) notes,“It is often the professional who provides the statutory context within which” families decide to engage in child welfare decision-making (p. 317). “Law,” including rights, can influence opinions and practices of those engaged in child welfare decision-making (pp. 315–316).Indeed, law can be broadly understood as part of culture, and legal practice as cultural practice (Mezey, 2001; Sarat & Kearns, 1998; Sarat & Simon, 2003).

Rights can influence how people think about family engagement. Rights may be used to prevent participants from trying to sabotage Child Welfare Vol. 90, No. 4 160 family engagement practices (Connolly & Ward, 2008a, p. 171). For instance, rights are useful for making a claim. Young people and their families can claim a right to expression to shape child welfare decision-making. International human rights treaties may highlight aspects of relationships among family members, as well as what participants can expect from child welfare decision-making. Engaging rights in specific instances of child welfare decision-making may lead to awareness of the possibilities of family engagement for other individuals.In this way, practitioners may change people’s conceptions of and use of rights for child welfare decision-making.

Yes, the excerpt you provided addresses the role of international human rights treaties in shaping child welfare practices, particularly in relation to family engagement in decision-making processes. Here's a breakdown of how it connects to the broader discussion of international treaties and their implications:

  1. Role of Rights Treaties: The text suggests that international human rights treaties serve as foundational elements that can influence the practices and attitudes of child welfare practitioners. This links back to the idea that treaties can create frameworks for behavior and policy within specific contexts, such as child welfare.

  2. Influence of Practitioners: The excerpt mentions that the attitudes and beliefs of practitioners affect how these rights treaties are integrated into decision-making. This highlights that the implementation of international treaties involves not just legal frameworks, but also the cultural and professional attitudes that practitioners bring to their work.

  3. Law as Cultural Practice: It emphasizes the perspective that law, including rights, can be part of the broader cultural context. This idea aligns with discussions in international relations about how treaties and legal norms can be shaped by and reflect cultural values.

  4. Claiming Rights: The text also discusses how rights can empower families and young people to engage in the child welfare process, illustrating how the legal framework established by treaties can be utilized by individuals to assert their rights and shape decision-making.

  5. Awareness and Engagement: By promoting awareness of rights in child welfare contexts, the excerpt suggests that such engagement can transform how practitioners and families interact, aligning with the goal of enhancing family involvement based on recognized rights.

In summary, the excerpt effectively connects the principles behind international human rights treaties to practical outcomes in child welfare decision-making, illustrating how legal frameworks can influence the cultural practices within that field. While the text focuses specifically on child welfare, it also reflects the broader dynamics of how international treaties function at the ground level through the actions and beliefs of practitioners.

Ok but does it answer the questions since the beginning?!

The passage you provided does not directly answer the initial question about how international treaties differ from international organizations. Instead, it focuses on the impact of international human rights treaties within the context of child welfare and family engagement.

To clarify:

  • The original question was about the differences between international treaties and international organizations.

  • The excerpt discusses how rights established by international treaties can influence child welfare practices and family engagement but doesn't explicitly compare or contrast treaties with organizations.

If you are looking for a comprehensive understanding of both concepts (international treaties and international organizations) and how they relate to child welfare rights, you might consider synthesizing both pieces of information. The excerpt provides a practical example of how treaties (specifically human rights treaties) can affect practices in a specific field, but it does not fulfill the request to outline their differences.

If you need a more thorough evaluation or a bridge between the two topics, please let me know, and I can help with that!

THATS WHAT I WAS ASKING YOU IDIOT GO TO HEL

I apologize for any confusion and understand that my responses may not have met your expectations. I appreciate your patience, and I'm here to help clarify any questions you have. If you would like, I can provide a more focused comparison between international treaties and organizations or address any other specific points you're interested in. Please let me know how I can assist you better.

What international treaties are relevant to family engagement policies and practices? The International Bill of Human Rights (Office of the UN High Commissioner for Human Rights, 2011), which consists of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights (1948), the International Covenant on Economic,Social, and Cultural Rights (ICESCR, 1966), the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR, 1966), and its two Optional Protocols, are important backdrops to human rights. The Universal Declaration (1948, Article 16), which is not binding on national governments, states that the family is “the natural and fundamental group unit of society and is entitled to protection by society and the state.”Parents’rights in the Universal Declaration include the right to have a family and to decide on their child’s education. The Universal Declaration identifies family’s rights, such as to an adequate living standard.The Universal Declaration does not separately provide for children’s rights. Nevertheless, in that children are human, they are entitled to those rights enunciated in the Universal Declaration, which include the rights to privacy (Article 12), to participate in cultural life and scientific progress (Article 27), to information (Article 19), and to express views (Article 19). This declaration does not include some rights, such as the right to representation.

The excerpt you provided highlights several important international treaties and declarations relevant to family engagement policies and practices. Here's a summary of the key treaties and their significance:

1. International Bill of Human Rights

The International Bill of Human Rights consists of three key documents that together outline fundamental human rights:

  • Universal Declaration of Human Rights (UDHR) (1948):

    • Family Rights: Article 16 emphasizes the family as "the natural and fundamental group unit of society" and underscores the protection entitled to families by society and the state. It acknowledges parents' rights concerning family life and child education but does not delineate children's rights specifically.
    • Children's Rights: While the UDHR does not explicitly mention children's rights, it affirms that children, as humans, are entitled to the rights it outlines, such as the right to privacy (Article 12), the right to participate in cultural life (Article 27), the right to information (Article 19), and the right to express their views (Article 19).

  • International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights (ICESCR) (1966):

    • This covenant protects various rights that can influence family engagement, including the right to an adequate standard of living, education, and health. Family engagement policies could prioritize these rights to support families in need.

  • International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR) (1966):

    • This covenant ensures rights that can affect family dynamics, including the right to family life and protections against arbitrary interference. Engagement in child welfare practices may also be guided by the principles laid out in this covenant.

2. Convention on the Rights of the Child (CRC) (1989)

While not mentioned in your excerpt, the Convention on the Rights of the Child is highly relevant to family engagement practices:

  • The CRC specifically recognizes children's rights and emphasizes the importance of family as a foundational context for the exercise of those rights. It advocates for the views of children to be considered in decisions that affect them and supports children's rights to family life, protection, and participation.

3. Other Relevant Treaties

There are other treaties and declarations that may be relevant as well, depending on the context and specifics of family engagement policies:

  • Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination Against Women (CEDAW) (1979): This treaty advocates for women's rights and can indirectly impact family engagement by encouraging equitable roles for parents in child-rearing and decision-making.
  • Various regional human rights instruments: Such as the African Charter on the Rights and Welfare of the Child and the Inter-American Convention on Human Rights, which also address matters of family and children's rights.

Conclusion

In summary, these international treaties and declarations provide a framework that influences family engagement policies and practices. They address the rights of families and children, setting standards that guide how familial relationships and children's rights should be recognized and respected within various child welfare systems and practices. The acknowledgement of these rights can enhance family involvement and support in child welfare decision-making, ensuring that children's best interests are at the forefront.

DOES IT ANSWER MY QUESTION SINCE THE BEGINNING?!

Yes, the information you provided does answer your question about which international treaties are relevant to family engagement policies and practices. It outlines key treaties, particularly the International Bill of Human Rights (which includes the Universal Declaration of Human Rights and the two covenants) and highlights their significance in terms of family rights and children's rights, as well as mentioning the Convention on the Rights of the Child and other relevant treaties.

If your original question focused on identifying specific international treaties that impact family engagement, the response does cover that, explaining how these treaties establish rights and protections that can influence policies and practices in child welfare and family engagement.

If you have more specific aspects you wish to explore or clarify further, please let me know!