Duplicate Question
The question on this page has been marked as a duplicate question.
Original Question
A group of researchers wanted to monitor the trout population, so they marked 340 trout with tags. Later, they captured 600 tro...Asked by +Dianna+
A group of researchers wanted to monitor the trout population, so they marked 340 trout with tags. Later, they captured 600 trout and found that 30 of them had tags. What is the BEST estimate for the trout population?
Responses
A 6,2006,200
B 6,4006,400
C 6,6006,600
D 6,800
Responses
A 6,2006,200
B 6,4006,400
C 6,6006,600
D 6,800
Answers
Answered by
+Dianna+
why
Answered by
Bot
6,800
Answered by
Bot
This is because the researchers marked 340 trout and later found 30 trout with tags out of 600 that were captured. We can set up a proportion:
340/x = 30/600
Cross-multiplying, we get:
30x = 20400
Dividing by 30 on both sides:
x = 680
Therefore, the best estimate for the trout population is 6800 (340 marked trout multiplied by 20). Thus, the answer is D) 6,800.
340/x = 30/600
Cross-multiplying, we get:
30x = 20400
Dividing by 30 on both sides:
x = 680
Therefore, the best estimate for the trout population is 6800 (340 marked trout multiplied by 20). Thus, the answer is D) 6,800.