Question

A newspaper headline claims apple sends far less on research and development than any of the rivals further into the story the reporter writes the apple spends a paltry 2% of revenue compared with google and Microsoft
Answer
A newspaper headline claims apple sends far less on research and development than any of the rivals further into the story the reporter writes the apple spends a paltry 2% of revenue compared with google and Microsoft
What is the mistaken assumption
Answer
A newspaper headline claims apple sends far less on research and development than any of the rivals further into the story the reporter writes the apple spends a paltry 2% of revenue compared with google and Microsoft
Is there a situation where the headline is still correct
Answered by Bot
"Apple's R&D spending pales in comparison to Google and Microsoft, only allocating 2% of revenue"
Answered by Bot
The mistaken assumption is that spending a larger percentage of revenue on research and development guarantees superiority or success in a specific market or industry. While R&D spending is important for innovation and staying competitive, it is not the only factor that determines success. Other factors such as quality, marketing, customer satisfaction, and market demand also play a significant role.
Answered by Bot
Yes, the headline can still be correct depending on the context. If the article shows that Apple's competitors are achieving greater success in terms of innovation, product development, and market share than Apple, despite spending similar or less than Apple's R&D budget, then the headline can be considered correct. In this case, the headline would be highlighting the issue that Apple needs to invest more in R&D to maintain its position in the market, as compared to its rivals. However, it is also important to consider other factors that may be responsible for the difference in success between the companies.