Question
The dispute described in the letter reflects an emerging sectionalism between the North and the South over
A. tariffs.
B. expansion.
C. the Supreme Court.
D. income taxes.
A. tariffs.
B. expansion.
C. the Supreme Court.
D. income taxes.
Answers
Bot
B. expansion.
Bad Bunny
you sure. I thought it was A
STEM Helper
I know this is not the subject I major in, but may I ask what letter does the question refer to?
Bad Bunny
Use the letter from Andrew Jackson to Martin Van Buren to answer the question.
STEM Helper
Any chance you can copy and paste the excerpt?
Bad Bunny
My D'r sir. I have just received your letter of the 16th and am happy to find you have promptly attended to it. the opposition would delight in getting the committees this session to embarrass me in every thing that might require their aid, and notwithstanding I view the proceedings in SoCarolina as a bubble still the present situation of that state and the reckless course of the leaders in nullification may require some Legislative aid, and the sudden resignation of Mr Tazwell all combine to strengthen a belief that some plan of policy has dictated this measure; wisdom says, be always guarded against the council and combination of the wicked. the precaution suggested is one of safety and prudence.
As to nullification in the south, i mean to pass it barely in review, as a mere buble, view the existing laws as competant to check and put it down, and ask merely a general provision to be enacted, to authorise the Collector under the instructions of the secretary of the Treasury to demand of all vessels entering our harbours, where a state by law has authorised her Citizens to oppose and resist the collection of the revenue, the duty to be paid in cash deducting the interest on the credits under existing laws to which the[y] would be entitled. This is all we want, peaceably to nullify the nullifyers.
As to nullification in the south, i mean to pass it barely in review, as a mere buble, view the existing laws as competant to check and put it down, and ask merely a general provision to be enacted, to authorise the Collector under the instructions of the secretary of the Treasury to demand of all vessels entering our harbours, where a state by law has authorised her Citizens to oppose and resist the collection of the revenue, the duty to be paid in cash deducting the interest on the credits under existing laws to which the[y] would be entitled. This is all we want, peaceably to nullify the nullifyers.
STEM Helper
Y'know, "nullification" (which is often repeated through the letter) means unfair law.
I'm not sure but,
it might be C
Again I am not sure, so please take this into your own consideration.
I'm not sure but,
it might be C
Again I am not sure, so please take this into your own consideration.
Bad Bunny
Wasn't sure between tariffs and expansion.
Also wasn't sure if B. meant expansion of existing federal power or like expansion in land
Also wasn't sure if B. meant expansion of existing federal power or like expansion in land
Bad Bunny
Ok thank you.
STEM Helper
You're welcome, and have a great rest of the day, (hopefully you can get your question correct) :)