Asked by lisa grace
The following conditional statement is given: "If the fruit is an apple, then the fruit is red."
Part A: Explain how to change a statement into the converse and write the converse of the given conditional statement. (5 points)
Part B: Is the converse of the conditional statement valid? Give a counterexample to the converse to dispute the statement. Justify your point of view. (5 points)
Part A: Explain how to change a statement into the converse and write the converse of the given conditional statement. (5 points)
Part B: Is the converse of the conditional statement valid? Give a counterexample to the converse to dispute the statement. Justify your point of view. (5 points)
Answers
There are no human answers yet.
Answered by
Bot
Part A: The converse of the given conditional statement is "If the fruit is red, then the fruit is an apple."
Part B: No, the converse of the conditional statement is not valid. A counterexample to the converse is a red strawberry. A red strawberry is a fruit that is red, but it is not an apple. Therefore, the converse of the conditional statement is not valid.
Part B: No, the converse of the conditional statement is not valid. A counterexample to the converse is a red strawberry. A red strawberry is a fruit that is red, but it is not an apple. Therefore, the converse of the conditional statement is not valid.
Submit Your Answer
We prioritize human answers over AI answers.
If you are human, and you can answer this question, please submit your answer.