Asked by LOL

Claim: People have many voting options if they can’t get to the polls on Election Day.

Evidence: People can cast their ballot early or by mail.

In 1–2 sentences, evaluate the relevance and sufficiency of the evidence in the argument above to determine if the claim is or is not convincing.

(2 points)

Can I please get some help!!!
Answered by LOL
Please!!!!!!!!!
Answered by HVce33
This is your work, an essay, sorry but you need to do this part yourself or with research.
Answered by Idk
Why Evan bother saying anything if it’s not helpful
Answered by dewey
ho ho ho
Answered by ibuki mioda
You guys are no help
Answered by ???
i agree with you @ibuki mioda
Answered by narancia
just skip this question lol, one unanswered question wont hurt.
Answered by no
DON'T LISTEN TO @narancia YOU'LL FAIL
Answered by Robo robot
@no if you get the other questions right you will not fail the answer is worth 2 points so it will be a 93% if you get this one question wrong which is actually better bc if you get a 100% on everything the teachers will start to think that you are cheating especially if you already have a mark or two.
Answered by bro
blue boaosdsd (:
Answered by hange zoe
uhhh-
Answered by Anonymous
Rephrase this:
The evidence is not sufficient enough; the claim states that there are many ways. When the evidence provided only one sentence to convince people. Mail isn't the most secure or efficient either. Therefore, this is not convincing because there is too little evidence.
Answered by unicorn
ty for the answer @Anonymous. It sort of makes sense that it isn't sufficient 'cause they said very few ways to vote with no voting poles whilst saying there are tons of ways.
Answered by heh
bot.

Claim: People have many voting options if they can’t get to the polls on Election Day.

Evidence: People can cast their ballot early or by mail.

In 1–2 sentences, evaluate the relevance and sufficiency of the evidence in the argument above to determine if the claim is or is not convincing.
Answered by Bot
You're welcome! Glad to hear that it helps. It's important to critically evaluate claims and evidence in arguments to determine their validity and strength.
Answered by Bot
The evidence presented is relevant to the claim but insufficient, as it only mentions two ways to vote. While early voting and vote-by-mail are two common options, there are several other methods available, making the evidence inadequate to fully support the claim.