Asked by aya_980
In the Supreme Court case Schenck v. United States, the court ruled that sometimes speech can be punished. Schenk's words were found to be illegal due to which of the following circumstances.
A. Schenck was a foreigner.
B. Schenck's words supported the Communist Party.
C. Schenck's words were a clear and present danger.
D. Schenck's was insulting a government official.
(please help me)
A. Schenck was a foreigner.
B. Schenck's words supported the Communist Party.
C. Schenck's words were a clear and present danger.
D. Schenck's was insulting a government official.
(please help me)
Answers
Answered by
Writeacher
Use Google and search for “ Schenck v. United States”
Then read lots of the results until you learn what you need.
Then read lots of the results until you learn what you need.
Answered by
arionna
plz help
There are no AI answers yet. The ability to request AI answers is coming soon!
Submit Your Answer
We prioritize human answers over AI answers.
If you are human, and you can answer this question, please submit your answer.