Asked by Maybelline
Wilmer spends at least 13 hours reading for his assignments each week, plus 1 hour completing each Reading Response assignment. The inequality that represents the total number of hours, y, Wilmer reads for his various assignments each week is y≥x+13, where x
represents the number of Reading Response assignments he completes.
This week, Wilmer can spend only 5
hours total reading for his various assignments.
Which explanation correctly analyzes whether there is a solution for this scenario?
There is no solution. For the inequality to be true, the value of x has to be negative. This is impossible because Wilmer can't have a negative number of Reading Response assignments.
The ordered pair (−8,5) is a solution to the inequality y≥x+13. This ordered pair shows that Wilmer can complete 8 Reading Responses in the 5 hours.
The ordered pair (5,18) is a solution to the inequality y≥x+13. This ordered pair shows that Wilmer can complete 18 Reading Responses in the 5 hours.
There is no solution. For the inequality to be true, the value of x has to be a fraction. This is impossible because Wilmer can't have a fractional number of Reading Response assignments.****
represents the number of Reading Response assignments he completes.
This week, Wilmer can spend only 5
hours total reading for his various assignments.
Which explanation correctly analyzes whether there is a solution for this scenario?
There is no solution. For the inequality to be true, the value of x has to be negative. This is impossible because Wilmer can't have a negative number of Reading Response assignments.
The ordered pair (−8,5) is a solution to the inequality y≥x+13. This ordered pair shows that Wilmer can complete 8 Reading Responses in the 5 hours.
The ordered pair (5,18) is a solution to the inequality y≥x+13. This ordered pair shows that Wilmer can complete 18 Reading Responses in the 5 hours.
There is no solution. For the inequality to be true, the value of x has to be a fraction. This is impossible because Wilmer can't have a fractional number of Reading Response assignments.****
Answers
Answered by
Anonymous
you reading this. obviously this question is on a school test isn’t it? you’re cheating your way through school and you’ll regret that in 10 years when you know nothing because you were a lowlife lazy child with no motivation to even try. disgusting.
Answered by
tucker magness
Hello Maybelline.
the correct answer is there is no solution because the value of x has to be a fraction. hope this helps with your math homework your cheating on by looking up the answer.
the correct answer is there is no solution because the value of x has to be a fraction. hope this helps with your math homework your cheating on by looking up the answer.
Answered by
lowlife lazy child with no motivation
yeah ok karen
Answered by
Anonymous
im guessing this is for algebra 1a checkpoint 14 ? i got 100% on it lmk idk how to give you the graph answers but go to desmos and put the equation in and it will help you. But for the world problems i can help. answers- "He makes more than $11 per hour plus $35 in tips." "6s+8c≥900" "45t+20b≤150" "There is no solution. For the inequality to be true, the value of x has to be negative. This is impossible because Wilmer can't have a negative number of Reading Response assignments. find the right question for the answer and put it in.
There are no AI answers yet. The ability to request AI answers is coming soon!
Submit Your Answer
We prioritize human answers over AI answers.
If you are human, and you can answer this question, please submit your answer.