Asked by anonymous's mom
Select the words to make the statements true.
After the French and Indian War, 1.the British Proclamation of 1763 barred** / expanded colonial settlement west of the Appalachian Mountains. 2.The Proclamation Line angered / emboldened American colonists, who had fought for the right to settle western lands. 3.The British insisted the line was necessary to prevent further conflict / loss of land.
I got barred for number one.
i cant figure out the rest xD
Answers
Answered by
Writeacher
Read carefully: http://www.ushistory.org/us/9a.asp
After the French and Indian War, 1.the British Proclamation of 1763 barred** / expanded colonial settlement west of the Appalachian Mountains.
<b>right</b>
2.The Proclamation Line angered / emboldened American colonists, who had fought for the right to settle western lands.
<b>??</b>
3.The British insisted the line was necessary to prevent further conflict / loss of land.
<b>??</b>
After you are clear on what that proclamation included, be sure you also use https://www.dictionary.com to look up the four words in 2 and 3.
After the French and Indian War, 1.the British Proclamation of 1763 barred** / expanded colonial settlement west of the Appalachian Mountains.
<b>right</b>
2.The Proclamation Line angered / emboldened American colonists, who had fought for the right to settle western lands.
<b>??</b>
3.The British insisted the line was necessary to prevent further conflict / loss of land.
<b>??</b>
After you are clear on what that proclamation included, be sure you also use https://www.dictionary.com to look up the four words in 2 and 3.
Answered by
anonymous's mom
Well thanks for your help :D
Can you check my answers when i get them?
:)
Can you check my answers when i get them?
:)
Answered by
Writeacher
Yes.
Answered by
anonymous's mom
Oki i might be wrong but i tired.
for 2, angered
and for 3, conflict
for 2, angered
and for 3, conflict
Answered by
Writeacher
I agree with your choice for 3, but not necessarily for 2. See my underlining in the interpretation below.
---------------------------
<i>Proclaim and Inflame
Despite the Treaty of Paris, many Native Americans continued to fight against European settlement of land west of Appalachia. Ottawa Chief Pontiac led numerous attacks against British and colonial expansion and settlement and his violent aggression is one reason Britain issued the Proclamation of 1763.
But what seemed simple to the British was not acceptable to their colonial subjects. This remedy did not address some concerns vitally important to the colonies. Colonial blood had been shed to fight the French and Indians, not to cede land to them. What was to be said for American colonists who had already settled in the West?
<u>In addition, the colonies themselves had already begun to set their sights on expanding their western boundaries; such planning sometimes even causing tension among the colonies. Why restrict their appetites to expand? Surely this must be a plot to keep the American colonists under the imperial thumb and east of the mountains, where they could be watched.</u>
Consequently, this law was observed with the same reverence the colonists reserved for the mercantile laws. Scores of wagons headed westward. How could the British possibly enforce this decree? It was nearly impossible.
The Proclamation of 1763 merely became part of the long list of events in which the intent and actions of one side was misunderstood or disregarded by the other.</i>
http://www.ushistory.org/us/9a.asp
---------------------------
<i>Proclaim and Inflame
Despite the Treaty of Paris, many Native Americans continued to fight against European settlement of land west of Appalachia. Ottawa Chief Pontiac led numerous attacks against British and colonial expansion and settlement and his violent aggression is one reason Britain issued the Proclamation of 1763.
But what seemed simple to the British was not acceptable to their colonial subjects. This remedy did not address some concerns vitally important to the colonies. Colonial blood had been shed to fight the French and Indians, not to cede land to them. What was to be said for American colonists who had already settled in the West?
<u>In addition, the colonies themselves had already begun to set their sights on expanding their western boundaries; such planning sometimes even causing tension among the colonies. Why restrict their appetites to expand? Surely this must be a plot to keep the American colonists under the imperial thumb and east of the mountains, where they could be watched.</u>
Consequently, this law was observed with the same reverence the colonists reserved for the mercantile laws. Scores of wagons headed westward. How could the British possibly enforce this decree? It was nearly impossible.
The Proclamation of 1763 merely became part of the long list of events in which the intent and actions of one side was misunderstood or disregarded by the other.</i>
http://www.ushistory.org/us/9a.asp
Answered by
Writeacher
I think 3 could be either choice, depending on how you think the colonists reacted to this proclamation.
Answered by
Nicholas
number 2 is angered
question 2 is tea act
question 2 is tea act
Answered by
anon
These answers are for the Colonial Discontent Quick Check - Conexus 9th grade.
1. After the French and Indian War, the British Proclamation of 1763 barred / expanded colonial settlement west of the Appalachian Mountains. The Proclamation Line angered / emboldened American colonists, who had fought for the right to settle western lands. The British insisted the line was necessary to prevent further conflict / loss of land.
Answer: After the French and Indian War, the British Proclamation of 1763 barred / expanded colonial settlement west of the Appalachian Mountains. The Proclamation Line angered / emboldened American colonists, who had fought for the right to settle western lands. The British insisted the line was necessary to prevent further conflict / loss of land.
2. Which law resulted in violence and property destruction, causing the closing of Boston Harbor?
answer: Tea act
3. Classify colonial responses to British policies after the French and Indian War as violent or nonviolent.
Answer:
Violent::
-Boston Massacre
-Stamp Act Congress
Nonviolent::
-Committees of Correspondence
-Non-Importation Movement
1. After the French and Indian War, the British Proclamation of 1763 barred / expanded colonial settlement west of the Appalachian Mountains. The Proclamation Line angered / emboldened American colonists, who had fought for the right to settle western lands. The British insisted the line was necessary to prevent further conflict / loss of land.
Answer: After the French and Indian War, the British Proclamation of 1763 barred / expanded colonial settlement west of the Appalachian Mountains. The Proclamation Line angered / emboldened American colonists, who had fought for the right to settle western lands. The British insisted the line was necessary to prevent further conflict / loss of land.
2. Which law resulted in violence and property destruction, causing the closing of Boston Harbor?
answer: Tea act
3. Classify colonial responses to British policies after the French and Indian War as violent or nonviolent.
Answer:
Violent::
-Boston Massacre
-Stamp Act Congress
Nonviolent::
-Committees of Correspondence
-Non-Importation Movement
Answered by
anon
These answers are for the Colonial Discontent Quick Check - Conexus 9th grade.
1. After the French and Indian War, the British Proclamation of 1763 barred / expanded colonial settlement west of the Appalachian Mountains. The Proclamation Line angered / emboldened American colonists, who had fought for the right to settle western lands. The British insisted the line was necessary to prevent further conflict / loss of land.
Answer: After the French and Indian War, the British Proclamation of 1763 {barred} / expanded colonial settlement west of the Appalachian Mountains. The Proclamation Line {angered} / emboldened American colonists, who had fought for the right to settle western lands. The British insisted the line was necessary to prevent further {conflict} / loss of land.
2. Which law resulted in violence and property destruction, causing the closing of Boston Harbor?
answer: Tea act
3. Classify colonial responses to British policies after the French and Indian War as violent or nonviolent.
Answer:
Violent::
-Boston Massacre
-Stamp Act Congress
Nonviolent::
-Committees of Correspondence
-Non-Importation Movement
1. After the French and Indian War, the British Proclamation of 1763 barred / expanded colonial settlement west of the Appalachian Mountains. The Proclamation Line angered / emboldened American colonists, who had fought for the right to settle western lands. The British insisted the line was necessary to prevent further conflict / loss of land.
Answer: After the French and Indian War, the British Proclamation of 1763 {barred} / expanded colonial settlement west of the Appalachian Mountains. The Proclamation Line {angered} / emboldened American colonists, who had fought for the right to settle western lands. The British insisted the line was necessary to prevent further {conflict} / loss of land.
2. Which law resulted in violence and property destruction, causing the closing of Boston Harbor?
answer: Tea act
3. Classify colonial responses to British policies after the French and Indian War as violent or nonviolent.
Answer:
Violent::
-Boston Massacre
-Stamp Act Congress
Nonviolent::
-Committees of Correspondence
-Non-Importation Movement
Answered by
ocean man
anon is 100% right; though on # 3 Stamp Act Congress counts as Nonviolent,
Answered by
Anonymous
anon is right but ocean mans correction is true
There are no AI answers yet. The ability to request AI answers is coming soon!
Submit Your Answer
We prioritize human answers over AI answers.
If you are human, and you can answer this question, please submit your answer.