Asked by makenzey
What factors should an editor consider when trying to judge the validity of a scientific report submitted for publication?
(Select all that apply)
if the report contains too much technical jargon
if the results agree with the editor’s own research results
if the writing shows evidence of bias
if the report is well organized
I think A and C
(Select all that apply)
if the report contains too much technical jargon
if the results agree with the editor’s own research results
if the writing shows evidence of bias
if the report is well organized
I think A and C
Answers
Answered by
Damon
I agree with C
I would consider A and D in deciding to publish, but A and D are not essential for "validity".
I would consider A and D in deciding to publish, but A and D are not essential for "validity".
Answered by
Shaylan.2003
its C and D
Answered by
cherie
I think? You THINK that is the answer??? What kind of answer is that??
Answered by
emmajj
it is c and d, i just took the quiz
Answered by
primavera
if the report is well organized
if the writing shows evidence of bias
if the writing shows evidence of bias
There are no AI answers yet. The ability to request AI answers is coming soon!
Submit Your Answer
We prioritize human answers over AI answers.
If you are human, and you can answer this question, please submit your answer.