Asked by Kat
Marcus studies two plant cells in biology class. One cell measures 8.0 * 10^-4 centimeter across. The other cell measures 2.0 * 10^-3 centimeter across. Marcus wants to know how many times greater the size of the larger cell is. He concludes that the larger cell is 40 times greater in size than the smaller cell.
He solved the equation like: 8/2=4. 10^-3/10^-4=10^1=10. 4*10=40.
Is his answer and process correct?
I think he is correct with it being 40,but I don't think that the way he did it was right. Am I right?
He solved the equation like: 8/2=4. 10^-3/10^-4=10^1=10. 4*10=40.
Is his answer and process correct?
I think he is correct with it being 40,but I don't think that the way he did it was right. Am I right?
Answers
Answered by
Reiny
incorrect,
first of all
2.0 * 10^-3 > 8.0 * 10^-4
so he should have divided 2.0 * 10^-3/(8.0 * 10^-4)
= 2/8 * 10^-3/10^-4
= .25 x 10^1
= 2.5
So the larger is 2.5 times as large as the smaller
check: 8.0 * 10^-4 = 0.0008
2.0 * 10^-3 = 0.002 , notice .002 > .0008
and .002/.0008 = 20/8 = 2.5
first of all
2.0 * 10^-3 > 8.0 * 10^-4
so he should have divided 2.0 * 10^-3/(8.0 * 10^-4)
= 2/8 * 10^-3/10^-4
= .25 x 10^1
= 2.5
So the larger is 2.5 times as large as the smaller
check: 8.0 * 10^-4 = 0.0008
2.0 * 10^-3 = 0.002 , notice .002 > .0008
and .002/.0008 = 20/8 = 2.5
Answered by
Steve
he's wrong, since 10^-3 is greater than 10^-4.
If you just consider the diameters of the cells, the ratio is
(2.0 * 10^-3) / (8.0 * 10^-4) = (2.0/8.0) * (10^-3 / 10^-4) = 0.25 * 10^1 = 2.5
The larger cell is 2.5 times as big across as the smaller cell.
However, its area is 2.5^2 = 6.25 times as large.
The division shown as his method is just screwy, since he is trying to divide
(a*b)/(c*d) but splits it up into
a/c * d/b
If you just consider the diameters of the cells, the ratio is
(2.0 * 10^-3) / (8.0 * 10^-4) = (2.0/8.0) * (10^-3 / 10^-4) = 0.25 * 10^1 = 2.5
The larger cell is 2.5 times as big across as the smaller cell.
However, its area is 2.5^2 = 6.25 times as large.
The division shown as his method is just screwy, since he is trying to divide
(a*b)/(c*d) but splits it up into
a/c * d/b
There are no AI answers yet. The ability to request AI answers is coming soon!
Submit Your Answer
We prioritize human answers over AI answers.
If you are human, and you can answer this question, please submit your answer.