Asked by rfvv
1. He bought Jane a present.
2. Jane was bought a present.
3. A present was bought for Jane.
According to Longman English grammar (which was published long ago, about 30 years ago.), #1 can be changed into #2. What about at present? Is this rule changed or not? When the verb bring is in a sentence, the direct object can be used as the subject in a passive voice sentence according to the grammar book. According to the rule, is #5 grammatical as well? Do we have to use 'to' or 'for' in #6? Are both okay?
4. He brought me a cup.
5. I was brought a cup by him.
6. A cup was brought to/for me by him.
2. Jane was bought a present.
3. A present was bought for Jane.
According to Longman English grammar (which was published long ago, about 30 years ago.), #1 can be changed into #2. What about at present? Is this rule changed or not? When the verb bring is in a sentence, the direct object can be used as the subject in a passive voice sentence according to the grammar book. According to the rule, is #5 grammatical as well? Do we have to use 'to' or 'for' in #6? Are both okay?
4. He brought me a cup.
5. I was brought a cup by him.
6. A cup was brought to/for me by him.
Answers
Answered by
Writeacher
2 is extremely awkward, and I doubt anyone uses it.
1 (active) and 3 (passive) express the same idea.
4 (active) and 6 (passive) express the same idea. 5 is REALLY awkward, and starts to imply that "I was brought" somewhere ... but then the words change. It's best to stick with 4 and 6.
1 and 3
4 and 6
Exclude 2 and 5.
1 (active) and 3 (passive) express the same idea.
4 (active) and 6 (passive) express the same idea. 5 is REALLY awkward, and starts to imply that "I was brought" somewhere ... but then the words change. It's best to stick with 4 and 6.
1 and 3
4 and 6
Exclude 2 and 5.
There are no AI answers yet. The ability to request AI answers is coming soon!
Submit Your Answer
We prioritize human answers over AI answers.
If you are human, and you can answer this question, please submit your answer.