Asked by Jamie
QUESTION: How do you determine the molar mass of the unknown, nonelectrolyte compound for each trial?
This is for a lab. My data is:
freezing point of solvent (water): -0.58
freezing point of unknown: -0.93
Mass of solvent (water): 19 ml
Mass of unknown: 1.045g
I know the formula to use is Tf=Kfm
So plugging that in, I got:
0.34=1.86*m
m=0.183
0.183=moles of solute/.019 kg
moles of solute = 3.477e-3
molar mass = 1.045g/3.477e-3
molar mass = 300.55
But I don't think this fits any of the possible compounds. Those being: Urea (60 g/mol), 2-deoxy-D-ribose (134 g/mol), D-ribose (150 g/mol), glucose (180 g/mol), sucrose (342 g/mol), alanine (89 g/mol), glycine 75 g/mol), or phenylalanine (165 g/mol).
I guess it could be sucrose? I don't think the data is bad, because the graph did the supercooling thing, and I did two trials of freezing the water. So the data should be right.
Can you see anything that I might have done wrong in my calculations?
This is for a lab. My data is:
freezing point of solvent (water): -0.58
freezing point of unknown: -0.93
Mass of solvent (water): 19 ml
Mass of unknown: 1.045g
I know the formula to use is Tf=Kfm
So plugging that in, I got:
0.34=1.86*m
m=0.183
0.183=moles of solute/.019 kg
moles of solute = 3.477e-3
molar mass = 1.045g/3.477e-3
molar mass = 300.55
But I don't think this fits any of the possible compounds. Those being: Urea (60 g/mol), 2-deoxy-D-ribose (134 g/mol), D-ribose (150 g/mol), glucose (180 g/mol), sucrose (342 g/mol), alanine (89 g/mol), glycine 75 g/mol), or phenylalanine (165 g/mol).
I guess it could be sucrose? I don't think the data is bad, because the graph did the supercooling thing, and I did two trials of freezing the water. So the data should be right.
Can you see anything that I might have done wrong in my calculations?
Answers
Answered by
DrBob222
First, the formula to use is delta T = Kf*m and delta T is 0.35 (not 0.34) Follow that through and you get about 292 for the experimental molar mass. None of the answers match. I think the freezing point of pure water at -0.58 C sounds fishy (it should be zero) BUI thermometers CAN be off by that much, I guess. After all, it's the DIFFEREMCE that counts and that difference is 0.35. I don't see anything wrong with your calculations; it has to be the data. One thing to remember is that this method of determining the molar mass is not and EXACT procedure. It can be off by 50% or so depending upon a lot of things. For non-volatile compounds,however, it is better than that but not error free. I would try decreasing/increasing those those molar mass of the compounds listed by +/- 10% and see if that gets close. For example 10% of 342 for sucrose is 342-34 = about308. So I might go with sucrose, also, especially when we consider that the 1.86 is an average of all compounds + you know there is the possibility of experimental error.
There are no AI answers yet. The ability to request AI answers is coming soon!
Submit Your Answer
We prioritize human answers over AI answers.
If you are human, and you can answer this question, please submit your answer.