Question
The value of mammography as a screening test for breast cancer has been controversial, particularly among young women. A study was recently performed looking at the rate of false positives for repeated screening mammograms among approximately 10,000 women who were members of Harvard Pilgrim Health Care, a large health-maintenance organization in New England. The study reported that of a total of 1996 tests given to 40-49 year old women, 156 yielded false –positives results.
Some physicians feel a mammogram is not cost-effective unless one can be reasonably certain (e.g., 95% certain) that the false-positive rate is less than 10%. Can you address this issue based on the preceding data? (Hint: Use a CI approach.) PLEASE NEATLY SHOW ALL WORK!
I think it's part a) .98
part b)
.96 to .99
Some physicians feel a mammogram is not cost-effective unless one can be reasonably certain (e.g., 95% certain) that the false-positive rate is less than 10%. Can you address this issue based on the preceding data? (Hint: Use a CI approach.) PLEASE NEATLY SHOW ALL WORK!
I think it's part a) .98
part b)
.96 to .99
Answers
google "single sample confidence interval"
look at the 1st article
look at the 1st article
Related Questions
How can we solve this using a Venn diagaram?
12 out of 1000 women at age forty who participate in r...
In a fictitious study, 100 out of 1000 people aged 60 years and over were positive in detecting brea...
16. A new test was developed for screening of breast cancer. This new test was applied on 750 women...