Question

An article in The Wall Street Journal discusses a trend among some large U.S. corporations to base the compensation of outside members of their boards of directors partly on the performance of the corporation. “This growing practice more closely aligns the director to the company. [Some] companies link certain stock or stock-option grants for directors to improved financial performance, using a measure such as annual return on equity.”
How would such a linkage tend to reduce the agency problem between mangers and shareholders as a whole? Why could directors be more efficient than shareholders at improving managerial performance and changing their incentives?

Answer 1

This is the third time you've posted this question in the last hour. Please be patient if an economist sees your question, s/he may answer it. In the meantime, please have patience and do not post this again for at least 24 hours.