Duplicate Question
The question on this page has been marked as a duplicate question.
Original Question
Hi, this question is about Langrange multipliers. Given f(x,y) = y^2 - x^2, subject to the constraint g(x,y) = 0.25x^2 + y^2 =...Asked by Justin
Hi, this question is about Langrange multipliers.
Given f(x,y) = y^2 - x^2, subject to the constraint g(x,y) = 0.25x^2 + y^2 = 1, find the max and mins.
So I found the partial derivatives for both f(x,y) and g(x,y):
fx = -2x
fy = 2y
gx = 0.5x
gy = 2y
And set them up for the Lagrange multipliers method. In essence, grad f(x,y) = lambda times grad g(x,y).
My algebra lead me to the roots of x=0 from the x partial derivatives and y=0 from the y partial derivatives. I plugged these into g(x,y) and got the points (0, ±1) (±2, 0).
So the book agrees with my critical points being (0, ±1) (±2, 0). The book also agrees that (0, ±1) should both be a max point equal to z=1.
However, the book says (2, 0) and (-2, 0) should both be a min point at z=4. Now if I'm not mistaken, to be a min point you must have fxx(a, b) > 0, but that can't be possible if fxx = d(fx)/dx = (-2x)' = -2. Also, it says f(±2, 0) = -4. Wouldn't that also require the x root being ±16?
Any insight appreciated.
Given f(x,y) = y^2 - x^2, subject to the constraint g(x,y) = 0.25x^2 + y^2 = 1, find the max and mins.
So I found the partial derivatives for both f(x,y) and g(x,y):
fx = -2x
fy = 2y
gx = 0.5x
gy = 2y
And set them up for the Lagrange multipliers method. In essence, grad f(x,y) = lambda times grad g(x,y).
My algebra lead me to the roots of x=0 from the x partial derivatives and y=0 from the y partial derivatives. I plugged these into g(x,y) and got the points (0, ±1) (±2, 0).
So the book agrees with my critical points being (0, ±1) (±2, 0). The book also agrees that (0, ±1) should both be a max point equal to z=1.
However, the book says (2, 0) and (-2, 0) should both be a min point at z=4. Now if I'm not mistaken, to be a min point you must have fxx(a, b) > 0, but that can't be possible if fxx = d(fx)/dx = (-2x)' = -2. Also, it says f(±2, 0) = -4. Wouldn't that also require the x root being ±16?
Any insight appreciated.
Answers
There are no human answers yet.
There are no AI answers yet. The ability to request AI answers is coming soon!
Submit Your Answer
We prioritize human answers over AI answers.
If you are human, and you can answer this question, please submit your answer.