Asked by Sami
Which of the following is important when a primary scheduled as heavily front-loaded as it was in 2008?
A. A clear stance on the issues
B. The ability to raise money
C. A comprehensive general election strategy
D. A steady, slow building following with the primary electorate <<<
Which of the following would be most likely to occur if there is no nominating step in American electoral politics?
A. many people run in the best most qualified candidate would win <<<< B. many people would run in the winter it would be an elected with a relatively small percentage of the vote
C.fewer people would run in the most votes will be wasted
D.fewer people with one and the differences between the candidates will be made very stark
A. A clear stance on the issues
B. The ability to raise money
C. A comprehensive general election strategy
D. A steady, slow building following with the primary electorate <<<
Which of the following would be most likely to occur if there is no nominating step in American electoral politics?
A. many people run in the best most qualified candidate would win <<<< B. many people would run in the winter it would be an elected with a relatively small percentage of the vote
C.fewer people would run in the most votes will be wasted
D.fewer people with one and the differences between the candidates will be made very stark
Answers
Answered by
Ms. Sue
Please proofread. Much of this makes no sense.
Answered by
Sami
Thats the problem I'm having, thats the way the questions are written in the quick check
Answered by
Right answers
B
D
A
D
A
Answered by
Ay Yo
The correct answer is the ability to raise money.
Answers for the QC:
- I cant remember
- D
- B
Answers for the QC:
- I cant remember
- D
- B
There are no AI answers yet. The ability to request AI answers is coming soon!
Submit Your Answer
We prioritize human answers over AI answers.
If you are human, and you can answer this question, please submit your answer.