Why literature thinks of science in a negative or destructive way?

Question

Can someone elaborate on this a bit? I'm not quite understanding it.

Answer 1

There is one quote but i forgot who said this:
"no science can replace a myth, and no myth can ever replace science."

Basically I think what it means is that literature and science are complete opposites.

Hope that helps.

Answer 2

I don't know if I or Jules Verne would agree with the proposition. Nor would I think that Isaac Asimov would agree.