Let's go through the steps of Izzie's work to check if the solution is correct.
We start with the inequality: \[ 3(t + 1) - 4t \geq -5. \]
Step 1: Distribute and simplify \[ 3(t + 1) - 4t \geq -5 \] \[ 3t + 3 - 4t \geq -5 \] This simplifies to: \[ -t + 3 \geq -5. \] This step is correct.
Step 2: Move the constant to the right
Now, we'll isolate the variable:
\[ -t + 3 \geq -5. \]
Subtracting 3 from both sides gives:
\[ -t \geq -8. \]
This step is incorrect; it should have been:
\[ -t \geq -5 - 3, \]
which simplifies to:
\[ -t \geq -8. \]
Step 3: Solve for \( t \) Now, we flip the inequality when we multiply or divide by a negative number: \[ t \leq 8. \] Again, this is where Izzie made a mistake. The correct inequality should be: \[ t \leq 8. \]
Therefore, the correct solution to the inequality is: \[ t \leq 8. \]
In her last step, Izzie wrote \( t \leq 2 \), which is incorrect. The correct solution is \( t \leq 8 \).